[Pulp-list] Importer Sync APIs

Jeff Ortel jortel at redhat.com
Mon Nov 28 14:09:55 UTC 2011



On 11/22/2011 11:23 AM, Jason L Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 10:18 -0500, Jay Dobies wrote:
>> I'm unsure of how people would best want the return type. I can see
>> an
>> argument for wanting to organize by unit keys too.
>>
>> So to that end, I'm returning a custom object (currently named
>> UnitBag,
>> but I may find something better) that offers a bunch of
>> transformations
>> (queries is probably a better term) on the set of units. So "give me
>> them by unit key" or "give me just the unit keys" or "give me them
>> mapped by ID". Stuff like that.
>
> I guess I don't really see the point of this. I'd like to just see an
> api that returns a list of ContentUnitData instances.

Perhaps the you can provide the best of both worlds and make the UnitBag iterable?

>
> If you decide that plugin writer want more granulatiry on their queries,
> the queries you're proposing could simply be methods on the conduit
> instead on some new UnitBag object.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list