[Pulp-list] Pulp Beyond 1.0

[John Morris]

On 04/03/2012 09:15 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> http://blog.pulpproject.org/2012/04/03/pulp-beyond-1-0/

Looks awesome.  I'd adopt pulp today if the remote filters worked.  Ha ha!

Just checking, does the v2.0 plan to support 'user-defined content' 
still mean software-repository-like content collections, or is pulp's 
function of content synch/distribution/deployment/etc. really being 
completely abstracted?

For v2.0, I like the idea of a plugin model.  I'd write a plugin that 
performed extra processing on repos after synching:  rebuild the 
metadata for filtered remote repos (ok, broken record here, and anyway I 
recall pulp might have done that for me anyway when I gave it a spin), 
and run repoview.

I'm betting that in v2.0, grinder will cease to exist as a separate 
entity and replaced with something new, sleek, pythonic and with real 
inherited OO classes.  Of course it may live on for awhile in a 
deprecated plugin.

	John