[Pulp-list] Puppet in the CLI

Jeff Ortel jortel at redhat.com
Tue Aug 21 18:53:03 UTC 2012


Agree with option #2.

On 08/21/2012 10:40 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/GCCLITypes
>
> When first adding the RPM extensions, I knew we'd have to figure
> something out when we supported Puppet but decided to hold off on the
> decision and see how things took shape.
>
> It's time to revisit the CLI structure and how to handle the fact that
> the Pulp team is now providing support for 2 different plugin packs,
> keeping in mind that that number may grow depending on what other types
> of content we decide to bite off and maintain as a team (or get
> contributed).
>
> The page above describes my thought process in how to handle our admin
> CLI with multiple types. I included some chat conversations with the
> community on what they think as well.
>
> It's pretty clear reading it which way I'm leaning. I'd like to come to
> a conclusion following the scrum meeting tomorrow, but I don't want to
> wait that long to hear any brilliant ideas you have on the issue since
> I'll probably start down a path this afternoon. So please reply to this
> or me personally if you have a strong opinion in any direction.
>




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list