[Pulp-list] repo clones

Todd Sanders tsanders at redhat.com
Fri Jan 20 13:35:29 UTC 2012


If this is occurring, consider it a bug.  The packages on the f/s should 
not be duplicated.  Please open a bugzilla 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pulp) with the 
specific details; include the pulp version.  Assuming the checksum type 
for both repos is the same.

Thanks!

-Todd

On 01/19/2012 01:19 PM, Golden, Joel wrote:
> If a clone points to the same file set of the master repo, why is the 
> amount of disk space consumer 2X?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Joel Golden, RHCE
> TW Telecom
> Unix Support / Senior Systems Administrator
> v. 303.542.6617
>
> -------------
>
> The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to 
> constitute formation of a contract binding *tw telecom*. *tw telecom* 
> will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized 
> officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by 
> express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee 
> or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
> have received this communication in error, please notify us 
> immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20120120/9d54e8e7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list