[Pulp-list] Python Module Header

Michael Hrivnak mhrivnak at redhat.com
Thu Oct 25 20:25:23 UTC 2012


I lean slightly on the side of following PEP-8. For me, that first line just looks unsightly. It has so much punctuation, especially those asterisks, that it sticks out.

That said, I'm happy either way.

Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Dobies" <jason.dobies at redhat.com>
To: pulp-list at redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:08:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Python Module Header

On 10/25/2012 04:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 11:32 AM, Jason Connor wrote:
>> +1 to the utf-8 coding header and the © symbol. Red Hat's default text
>> file encoding is utf-8 and I think the header looks professional. I
>> don't know why pep-8 says not to use a mechanism they provide, but
>> this is on of the few times I disagree with it.
>
> Haha, I think I was one of the ones PEP-8ing it. I'd put a mild +0.1 I
> suppose. I don't feel too strongly about it…

Wasn't just you, I did it for a bit too. :)


-- 
Jay Dobies
Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list