[Pulp-list] [devel] Celery 3.1.10 Released
Brian Bouterse
bbouters at redhat.com
Mon Mar 24 15:03:01 UTC 2014
I propose that we leave the 2.4 release locked in at Celery 3.1.9. I don't think that Celery bug will be on any code paths, and we can upgrade and test the latest with the 2.4.1 release. What do you think about that?
-Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Barlow" <rbarlow at redhat.com>
To: pulp-list at redhat.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:42:06 AM
Subject: [Pulp-list] [devel] Celery 3.1.10 Released
Celery 3.1.10 was recently released[0]. Should we upgrade (from 3.1.9),
or is it too late in the development cycle? Upgrading would require also
upgrading to Kombu 3.0.14 (we're at 3.0.13.)
I've read the release notes, and nothing sounds critical for our use of
Celery. There is one note that might be interesting about Task.retry()
ignoring its queue argument. I don't believe that we explicitly call
Task.retry(), but I wonder if Celery uses that for any autoretry
behaviors that might happen. If so, that might be important for us since
our queues are used for resource locking.
[0] http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/changelog.html#version-3-1-10
--
Randy Barlow
Raleigh, NC, USA
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
More information about the Pulp-list
mailing list