[Pulp-list] [devel] Celery 3.1.10 Released

Brian Bouterse bbouters at redhat.com
Mon Mar 24 15:03:01 UTC 2014


I propose that we leave the 2.4 release locked in at Celery 3.1.9.  I don't think that Celery bug will be on any code paths, and we can upgrade and test the latest with the 2.4.1 release.  What do you think about that?

-Brian


----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Barlow" <rbarlow at redhat.com>
To: pulp-list at redhat.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:42:06 AM
Subject: [Pulp-list] [devel] Celery 3.1.10 Released

Celery 3.1.10 was recently released[0]. Should we upgrade (from 3.1.9), 
or is it too late in the development cycle? Upgrading would require also 
upgrading to Kombu 3.0.14 (we're at 3.0.13.)

I've read the release notes, and nothing sounds critical for our use of 
Celery. There is one note that might be interesting about Task.retry() 
ignoring its queue argument. I don't believe that we explicitly call 
Task.retry(), but I wonder if Celery uses that for any autoretry 
behaviors that might happen. If so, that might be important for us since 
our queues are used for resource locking.

[0] http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/changelog.html#version-3-1-10

-- 
Randy Barlow
Raleigh, NC, USA

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list