[Pulp-list] Docs Organization Proposal

Jeff Ortel jortel at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 22:39:42 UTC 2014

On 11/21/2014 04:05 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 04:32 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
>> Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
>> Thoughts?
> I think we can reorganize the docs with any release if we want to. I
> don't think that violates semantic versioning. I wouldn't want to do it
> to the docs from an already released version, but if we work out of
> master and it just goes into some future release I think that's fine.

Not worried about semantic versioning.  Just thinking that users 
anticipate a lot of changes with major releases and not so much with 
minor ones.  Probably not a big deal.

> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

More information about the Pulp-list mailing list