[Pulp-list] Docs Organization Proposal
Jeff Ortel
jortel at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 22:39:42 UTC 2014
On 11/21/2014 04:05 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 04:32 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
>> Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think we can reorganize the docs with any release if we want to. I
> don't think that violates semantic versioning. I wouldn't want to do it
> to the docs from an already released version, but if we work out of
> master and it just goes into some future release I think that's fine.
Not worried about semantic versioning. Just thinking that users
anticipate a lot of changes with major releases and not so much with
minor ones. Probably not a big deal.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
More information about the Pulp-list
mailing list