[Pulp-list] Is master going to be 2.6 or 3.0 (an API change question)?

[Randy Barlow]

On 09/23/2014 03:00 PM, Michael Hrivnak wrote:
> You could have the web handler copy the attribute "worker_name" to "queue", so the API returns both. Then mark "queue" as deprecated in the documentation. That would let us comfortably release this as part of a 2.6 or 3.0.

This is a fantastic suggestion!

> Would that cover all public-API use cases? Or does that data get exposed through other APIs also besides just this? https://pulp-dev-guide.readthedocs.org/en/pulp-2.4/integration/rest-api/dispatch/task.html

The only other case I can think of that is technically public is our
bindings, but we could do the same thing there (make sure it's available
through both attributes).

How does that sound to you Brian?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20140923/f87c3cf0/attachment.sig>