[Pulp-list] Synchronize Git Repositories: Crazy?

[Nick Coghlan]

On 4 September 2015 at 01:55, Randy Barlow <rbarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 I think this is a great idea. I was thinking a bit about it, and it
> occurred to me that repo groups might be a nice data structure to do this
> with. We are hoping to move towards strongly typed repos, but nothing says
> that the repos in a repo group have to be the same type. If Pulp introduced
> a way to promote repo groups (similar to repo promotion), I think that would
> go a long way towards helping you accomplish this idea.

As a slight variant on this idea, for an S2I image, there's actually a
trio of components at the top: your source repo, your builder image,
and the topmost image in the runtime layer stack (which then brings in
the rest of the layers).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia