[Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Webb, Reece Reece.Webb at ucsf.edu
Thu Sep 17 21:56:23 UTC 2015


After recreating all of my repositories, I ran into the offset and metadata errors again today. I can confirm the metadata error isn't generated due to problems with upstream; the repository I last saw it on was local and during publish.

I don't know if this helps, or if it's just coincidence, but the metadata errors have only (today) been on repositories where the feed has a cert. My other repos (local, CentOS, EPEL) had the offset error. I'm usually able to successfully sync after recreating the repository, but not always.

The new "pulp-admin tasks list" functionality was the main reason I upgraded, but I think I'm going to have to go back to 2.6.3 until things stabilize.

Reece



On 9/16/15, 2:56 PM, "Webb, Reece" <Reece.Webb at ucsf.edu> wrote:

>Thanks Randy, the CDN/metadata errors aren't showing up right now, so maybe it was just a temporary fluke. I successfully synced right before the upgrade to 2.7, so I assumed the worse. :) In any case, I'll keep an eye on it for the next couple of days to make sure the error doesn't return. And if there's any other info I can provide to help get the email issue resolved, please let me know.
>
>Reece
>
>
>
>
>On 9/16/15, 2:39 PM, "Randy Barlow" <rbarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>Webb, Reece wrote:
>>> Thanks, I upgraded from 2.6.3. As I said in my last follow-up email, recreating a repository allow it to successfully sync/publish. But now I'm running into two other issues... email notification events don't work at all. I've also run into an error retrieving metadata on seemingly random repositories that I've tried recreating to workaround the offset error. I can recreate the repository, but I receive the same error. I found one bug report with this error that turned out to be a selinux issue, but I have selinux disabled... not good. Logs below.
>>
>>Hi Reece,
>>
>>Apologies, I misread your earlier e-mail and I thought it said you had
>>upgraded to 2.6.3, not from 2.6.3. I updated the bug report to reflect
>>that now.
>>
>>As for the e-mail error - would you mind filing a bug about that?
>>
>>The CDN error is more surprising. Perhaps it is possible that the CDN
>>really was missing that file for a bit? Can you confirm whether that
>>error is repeatable?
>>




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list