[Pulp-list] Pulp documentation error for Parent and Child node

[Bradley Davis]

Do you think it would be worthwhile to add that note into the
documentation? Or add a clarification to the general installation chapter
as well as the nodes chapter? Numerous people on my team read it the same
way, where resource manager and celerybeat were not to be run on more than
one node?

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Randy Barlow <rbarlow at redhat.com> wrote:

> Bradley Davis wrote:
> > It makes it seems that pulp_resource_manager and pulp_celerybeat should
> > not be running on the child node server. When looking at the Nodes
> > chapter, neither services are mentioned.
>
> Hello Brad!
>
> Apologies for the confusion. Each node is a complete Pulp installation
> that is largely independent of the other (aside from it's ability to
> synchronize content). Thus, each node should have exactly one resource
> manager and one celerybeat running. Hope that helps!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20150918/0f65cc8a/attachment.htm>