[Pulp-list] Deprecating Pulp Nodes

[Kodiak Firesmith]

I'm good with this mostly just because Pulp 2.x schedules left a lot to be
desired.  It would have been nice if they were more like roles where you
could create a schedule once, eg: DAILY-0030, and associate multiple repos
w/ it.

I'm guessing you are dropping scheduling because Katello handles scheduling
on it's own?

 - Kodiak

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Jeffrey,
>
> That’s a great question. We are not in fact planning to support sync
> schedules in 3.0. We’re encouraging users to use other tools like cron and
> systemd timers instead. Here’s an overview of what we’re planning for Pulp
> 3.0:
>
> https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_Viable_Product
>
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Miller, Jeffrey L <jeff-l-miller at uiowa.edu
> > wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is scheduling syncs also being removed? I see the blog post is using cron
>> to sync or publish the repository instead of setting a schedule.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Jeffrey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* pulp-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:pulp-list-bounces at redhat.com]
>> *On Behalf Of *David Davis
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 8, 2016 8:08 AM
>> *To:* pulp-list at redhat.com
>> *Subject:* [Pulp-list] Deprecating Pulp Nodes
>>
>>
>>
>> We wrote a blog post about removing Nodes in Pulp 3.0 but I figured I'd
>> sent out an email as well in order to increase visibility. Nodes will be
>> officially deprecated in Pulp 2.12 and then removed in Pulp 3.0. For more
>> information about why we deprecated Nodes and how you can reproduce their
>> functionality using a standard install of Pulp, check out the blog post:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://pulpproject.org/2016/12/07/deprecating-nodes/
>>
>>
>>
>> Feel free to respond with any questions or concerns.
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20161208/2dd878fc/attachment.htm>