[Pulp-list] Feedback needed: new user/auth system in 3.0

Michael Hrivnak mhrivnak at redhat.com
Fri Jul 15 19:29:14 UTC 2016


As many of you know, we are switching from mongodb to postgres in Pulp 3.0.
This will come with quite a few changes. For one in particular, we need
your input about how you use Pulp's user and permission system. Anything
you can tell us about how you use the current user/perm system would be
very helpful. We are considering the use of Django's built-in user/auth
system [0] as a replacement for what Pulp currently has.

If we hear silence, we might be more likely to change things, so let us
know what is important to you.

Have you integrated Pulp with a separate authentication source? Which one?

Do you assign permissions to specific users? How granular do you need that
to be?

Have you created "roles" in Pulp?

Anything else you want us to know or to think about?

If you would like to provide input confidentially, you are welcome to
contact me directly.

[0] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/topics/auth/

Thank you!
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160715/d1f407e1/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list