[Pulp-list] Missing Erratum

[Michael Hrivnak]

Using good-old curl, grep, and wc, I also came up with 3645 errata in the
RHEL 6 current "server" repo for x86_64 on the Red Hat CDN. One possible
explanation for seeing more errata at the RHN link is that some of them
might be architecture-specific, and thus wouldn't show up in the x86_64
repo you sync'd. There are probably some other reasonable explanations as
well.

One way or another, you definitely got all of the errata that are available
in that repo on the Red Hat CDN.

Michael


On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Madey <mattmadey at gmail.com> wrote:

> When I sync Pulp with the RHEL repositories, I notice I'm missing hundreds
> of Errata.. even though I don't have any errors when running the sync. For
> instance, looking at my RHEL6 repo in Pulp, it shows 3645 Erratum. When I
> look at Red Hat's advisory board (
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html), it shows 3,837 Errata.
> Why the discrepancy?
>
> Display Name:        rhel-x86_64-server-6-base
> Description:         None
> Content Unit Counts:
>   Erratum:                3645
>   Package Category:       10
>   Package Group:          202
>   Rpm:                    35911
>   Yum Repo Metadata File: 1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160601/ee35bf39/attachment.htm>