[Pulp-list] [Discuss] Pulp/crane as container repo for CentOS Container Pipeline

[Michael Hrivnak]

Mohammed,

The problem is revealed in this strange-looking error, seen on line 16 of
your paste: "local error: no renegotiation".

Docker is written in Go, the network library for which famously and
contentiously [0] does not support TLS renegotiation.

So the challenge with docker is that you must host the API (crane in this
case) and the image files on web servers that will not require
renegotiation.

[0] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/5742

Michael

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000 at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  I am Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, part of Container Tooling Team at Redhat,
> working on the registry component of the CentOS Container Pipeline.
>
> I have been trying to get pulp/crane to work for sometime now to get it to
> fit into the pipeline. I have setup pulp/crane on a single node (self
> signed certificates) while a second node acts as a client (pulp-admin and
> docker) currently stuck at this point http://pastebin.centos.org/40926/
> and would appreciate any help in getting things to work.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> *Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, *
> +919986458839
> Bengaluru, India
>
> https://mohammedzee1000.wordpress.com/
> <http://mohammed-zeeshan.strikingly.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160306/ed35afa5/attachment.htm>