[Pulp-list] Draft 2.9.0 release schedule

Kodiak Firesmith kfiresmith at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 14:06:47 UTC 2016

Will there be an "LTS-like" version released periodically for stable
production use?  I mean, I get that it's not a supported product like
Satellite 6, but since I'm planning to use it in production I'd like to be
able to stick with a single version for about 12 months without feeling
like I need to upgrade every 3 months to address any issues that pop up.

But then again the upgrade process from 2.7 --> 2.8 was such a breeze maybe
I should just get over my annual upgrade habit that has come from the
cadence of Satellite 5.x releases.

 - Kodiak

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Randy Barlow <rbarlow at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:56:04AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> > you guys are thinking a three month time based cadence?
> That is the current proposal. We discussed it during a meeting last week
> and it was suggested that something between 3 and 6 months would work
> well. We can always adjust if we find that it is too short (I doubt
> we'll think it's too long ☺).
> What do you think?
> --
> Randy Barlow
> irc:   bowlofeggs
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160321/670d8144/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-list mailing list