[Pulp-list] Bug Inquisition?

Preethi Thomas pthomas at redhat.com
Tue May 17 11:58:17 UTC 2016

I am in favor of going through the bugs to make sure that the open issues
are either closed or properly triaged.

Here is an idea of something foreman did as part of a bug day involving the
community. This may be something we can do as well.

   These are some quick links to the foreman bugday.

      - http://pad-katello.rhcloud.com/p/foreman-bugday



On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com> wrote:

> We have a lot of open bugs that can probably be closed; either
> they've already been fixed or they no longer apply to the
> current version of pulp. To help deal with this, a monthly meeting
> has been proposed to "triage" old bugs. Before considering a
> re-triage of these old bugs, it seems like it might be useful to
> do an "inquisition" (credit to mhrivnak for the term) and closing
> out bugs that are obviously no longer useful.
> Unfortunately, there are 970 open bugs in Redmine at the time
> I'm writing this, so even if we commit to doing 100 bugs in one
> of these monthly sessions, it'll be 10 months before we've gotten
> through that backlog, and new bugs will be coming in all the while.
> I think it's a really good idea to go through all of these, but we
> need to come up with a sort of litmus test to Yea/Nay the closing
> of issues that we can apply to our backlog to make cleaning these
> issues out less painful. Unfortunately, after looking at this for
> a little while, nothing is really popping out at me as a way to
> make the process easy, or easy to distribute.
> Any ideas?
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160517/b547b119/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-list mailing list