[Pulp-list] Bug Inquisition?

[Bryan Kearney]

If you kill off bugs which are tied to satellite bugzillas, let me know 
and I will clean up the satellite items.

-- bk

On 05/17/2016 09:19 AM, Eric Helms wrote:
> You could consider a grim reaper policy:
>
>
> https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/icsm/2013/4981/00/4981a436-abs.html
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Preethi Thomas <pthomas at redhat.com
> <mailto:pthomas at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     I am in favor of going through the bugs to make sure that the open
>     issues are either closed or properly triaged.
>
>     Here is an idea of something foreman did as part of a bug day
>     involving the community. This may be something we can do as well.
>
>         These are some quick links to the foreman bugday.
>
>            - http://pad-katello.rhcloud.com/p/foreman-bugday
>
>         -
>     https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/foreman-users/WVLNY3Cq7VA/discussion
>     <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/foreman-users/WVLNY3Cq7VA/discussion>
>
>     Thanks
>     Preethi
>
>
>
>
>     On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Sean Myers <sean.myers at redhat.com
>     <mailto:sean.myers at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>         We have a lot of open bugs that can probably be closed; either
>         they've already been fixed or they no longer apply to the
>         current version of pulp. To help deal with this, a monthly meeting
>         has been proposed to "triage" old bugs. Before considering a
>         re-triage of these old bugs, it seems like it might be useful to
>         do an "inquisition" (credit to mhrivnak for the term) and closing
>         out bugs that are obviously no longer useful.
>
>         Unfortunately, there are 970 open bugs in Redmine at the time
>         I'm writing this, so even if we commit to doing 100 bugs in one
>         of these monthly sessions, it'll be 10 months before we've gotten
>         through that backlog, and new bugs will be coming in all the while.
>
>         I think it's a really good idea to go through all of these, but we
>         need to come up with a sort of litmus test to Yea/Nay the closing
>         of issues that we can apply to our backlog to make cleaning these
>         issues out less painful. Unfortunately, after looking at this for
>         a little while, nothing is really popping out at me as a way to
>         make the process easy, or easy to distribute.
>
>         Any ideas?
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Pulp-list mailing list
>         Pulp-list at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list at redhat.com>
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pulp-list mailing list
>     Pulp-list at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list at redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>