[Pulp-list] Request recommendation for managing repos

[Donald Wolfe]

Group,

Just got pulp working and am able to update my RHEL/CentOS 6/7 test systems now with the help from some of you on this list.  Thank you!!  :)

Some of our production systems have many third party or application related repositories configured in addition to the ones from Redhat/CentOS.  My manager has suggested that maybe the application related ones should be left to the application teams to manage.  Is it possible or recommended to manage some repositories on a system with pulp (to be updated periodically on a schedule) while leaving others pointed at the original repositories?  What are the potential repercussions around package version dependencies, and the like?


Thank you, and best regards,

Don Wolfe
Sr. Unix Administrator
Central Garden and Pet
1340 Treat Blvd. Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Email:  dwolfe at central.com
Office:  (925) 948-2829
Mobile:  (925) 239-5941

Disclaimer: This communication and any attachments contain private, confidential, privileged and/or proprietary information intended solely for the Recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended Recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If received in error, we apologize and ask that you please notify the Sender by returning this e-mail and permanently deleting this communication from your computer, including destruction of any printed copies. Any views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Company represented by this e-mail source. No contracts, agreements or legally binding understandings may be entered into solely by an e-mail communication.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20161109/4801adfa/attachment.htm>