[Pulp-list] pulp service name change in Pulp 2.20.0

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Wed Jun 12 15:16:04 UTC 2019


+1

David


On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:07 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've received some off-list feedback on this decision. As a result, this
> change is no longer going to happen. Pulp 3 services will instead be
> renamed to
>
> pulpcore-resource-manager
> pulpcore-workers
> pulpcore-worker-{n}
>
> The problem with renaming Pulp 2 services is best summarized by Ewoud[0].
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/100#pullrequestreview-248572656
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:09 PM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Users of Pulp 2 wishing to upgrade to Pulp 3 will want to be able to run
>> both versions on the same machine for the duration of their migration from
>> one to the other. Supporting such a use case requires changing some of the
>> systemd unit names for Pulp 2 services. Starting with Pulp 2.20.0, the
>> following service names will be used:
>>
>> pulp2_resource_manager
>> pulp2_workers
>> pulp2_worker-{n}
>>
>> We realize that this is a backwards incompatible change that goes against
>> semantic versioning principals. Please refer to the developer mailing list
>> for background for this decision[0].
>>
>>
>> [0] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2019-March/msg00085.html
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20190612/a2c547e7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list