[Pulp-list] Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19

Brian Bouterse bmbouter at redhat.com
Tue Apr 21 13:13:03 UTC 2020


Hi Bin,

Related to this issue, I have some questions I'm interested in. I posted
them here https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6463#note-1 If you're able to post
any info you have that would be great.

Thanks.
Brian

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:12 PM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <
bli111 at bloomberg.net> wrote:

> We are still seeing the same errors on 8 repos out of total of 270. The
> sync job failed immediately when we tried to resync. However, if we delete
> and recreate the repo, we don't see the errors when we sync.
>
>
> From: pulp-list at redhat.com At: 04/20/20 12:01:43
> To: pulp-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19
>
> Send Pulp-list mailing list submissions to
> pulp-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pulp-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pulp-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pulp-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error (Dennis Kliban)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:25:42 -0400
> From: Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
> To: Bin Li <bli111 at bloomberg.net>
> Cc: pulp-list <pulp-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error
> Message-ID:
> <CAPmNiups_9X_xW2nfNM2qXt_QSd-KWFuJ731L7YV56cMDby-pA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> The issue does not have any steps to reproduce it. Have you been able to
> consistently reproduce the issue with a specific repository? Does it go
> away the next time you perform the sync?
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:03 AM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <
> bli111 at bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Brian. I filed an issue https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6463
> >
> > From: bmbouter at redhat.com At: 04/07/20 15:59:11
> > To: Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK ) <bli111 at bloomberg.net>
> > Cc: pulp-list at redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error
> >
> > I heard another developer report a similar issue, but we couldn't
> > reproduce it. Could you file this as an issue also please?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <
> > bli111 at bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Noticed we have a few errors when running sync.
> >>
> >> "error": {
> >> "description": "duplicate key value violates unique constraint
> >> \"core_repositoryversion_repository_id_number_3c54ce50_uniq\"\nDETAIL:
> Key
> >> (repository_id, number)=(59eb02b1-edab-46e3-a69b-d69a8b314f20, 2)
> already
> >> exists.\n",
> >>
> >> What could be the cause of this? How can we resolve it?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pulp-list mailing list
> >> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > Pulp-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20200420/6c0bc1a7/atta
> chment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
> End of Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19
> ******************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20200421/756d21a5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list