[Pulp-list] pulpcore-3.6.0 and TaskResponse.reserved_resources_record bindings

[Dennis Kliban]

This is not an intended change. Please file a bug at
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/new/ and we will try to address it as soon as
possible.


On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:31 AM Sebastian Skracic <sskracic at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>   Howdi all!
>
>   I have just upgraded the backend to pulpcore-3.6.0 and
> pulp-rpm-3.6.0, and then bumped the corresponding Python bindings to
> pulpcore-client==3.6.0 and pulp-rpm-client==3.6.0.
>
>   To my surprise, I've discovered that 'reserved_resources_record'
> for tasks is no longer present in the bindings, and is omitted from the
> OpenAPI specs, cf: https://pulp3.skracic.net/pulp/api/v3/docs/api.json
> (search for TaskResponse)
>
>   What's puzzling me is that the field is still present in the REST
> responses, so it's technically possible to fetch it using
> pulpcore-client==3.5.0 bindings.
>
>   Is this an intended change or maybe a glitch in OpenAPI generation
> process?
>
>   Thanks,
>
> --
> Sebastian Skracic   -  Red Hat  -   sskracic at redhat.com
> GPG: 9D5B 2B87 908E 85B6 5D1E  3527 76B7 6594 08A5 A206
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20200818/c67d2e5d/attachment.htm>