[Pulp-list] [Pulp-dev] Github Discussions

[David Davis]

Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in
favor of of using Github Discussions[0] for developer discussions.

If there are no objections, I plan to decommission the pulp-dev list next
week.

[0] https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions

David


On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:01 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbouter at redhat.com> wrote:

> I did this also for the pulpcore meeting:
> https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/8
>
> My format was a little different, but the same idea.
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM Grant Gainey <ggainey at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions to its own repo:
>>> https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions.
>>>
>>
>> Brillliant!
>>
>> One discovery I made this week - for 'Meetings' threads that exist to
>> have meeting-minutes posted, the first entry should be a description of
>> what the meeting you're recording is for, and each set of minutes should be
>> a comment. This lets the reader sort by "Newest" and get
>> most-recent-minutes-first.The initial message in a discussion is always at
>> the top, no matter how you sort - so if it's your first meeting-minutes,
>> they'll always be first.
>>
>> I redid the katello/pulp and community/pulp integration
>> discussion-threads (in their new location) in light of this, apologies to
>> anyone who got some notification-spam as a result this morning.
>>
>>    - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/7
>>    - https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/4
>>
>> G
>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:49 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've heard from the community about the amount of friction involved in
>>>> getting help with Pulp and one of the areas I think we could improve is
>>>> user communications. We currently run two mailing lists: pulp-list and
>>>> pulp-dev.
>>>>
>>>> At today's open floor meeting, we talked about using Github's new
>>>> Discussions feature[0] to host these conversations instead. I've set up a
>>>> Discussion against pulpcore[1] for us to try but here's also an example of
>>>> a project that has a lot of threads[2].
>>>>
>>>> I think the consensus was that we'd just keep pulpcore as our one and
>>>> only Github Discussions instance, which would serve as a replacement for
>>>> pulp-list and pulp-dev. I'd propose that we try this out for a bit and
>>>> eventually decommission our mailing lists.
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://docs.github.com/en/discussions
>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/discussions
>>>> [2] https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-list mailing list
>>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Grant Gainey
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20210616/ec91c4e6/attachment.htm>