[Rdo-list] python-backports is arch-specific?

[Chris Tyler]

It's arch specific because of %{python_sitearch} which can be in the
/usr/lib or /usr/lib64 trees.

-Chris
 On Feb 3, 2014 3:32 PM, "Kashyap Chamarthy" <kchamart at redhat.com> wrote:

> [Adding the list. /me inadvertantly dropped it, sorry.]
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:54:10AM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > CC'ing Ian Weller, from Fedora packagedb, he appears to be the owner of
> > it:
> >
> >     $ pkgdb-cli acl python-backports
> >     Fedora Package Database -- python-backports
> >     Namespace for backported Python features
> >     0 bugs open (new, assigned, needinfo)
> >     devel   Owner:          ianweller
> >     [. . .]
> >
> > --
> > /kashyap
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 01:39:26PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > > Hey, I'm mainly asking for RHEL 6.5 but also using Fedora 19 and
> > > when updating to the latest python-backports-ssl_match_hostname it
> > > requires python-backports to avoid a file conflict.
> > >
> > > However, I noticed that while python-backports-ssl_match_hostname is
> > > noarch, python-backports is arch-specific.  Looking at the source
> > > for backports, it's not really clear to me why that is - can someone
> > > explain if it's intentional or a packaging oversight?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt Riedemann
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rdo-list mailing list
> > > Rdo-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/attachments/20140203/8b0fb9f4/attachment.htm>