[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] Instack-virt-setup vs TripleO QuickStart in regards of managing HA PCS/Corosync cluster via pcs CLI

Attila, Raoul
Can you please investigate this issue.


On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets hotmail com> wrote:

TripleO HA Controller been installed via instack-virt-setup  has PCS CLI like :-

pcs resource cleanup neutron-server-clone
pcs resource cleanup openstack-nova-api-clone
pcs resource cleanup openstack-nova-consoleauth-clone
pcs resource cleanup openstack-heat-engine-clone
pcs resource cleanup openstack-cinder-api-clone
pcs resource cleanup openstack-glance-registry-clone
pcs resource cleanup httpd-clone
been working  as expected on bare metal

Same cluster been setup via QuickStart  (Virtual ENV) after bouncing one of controllers

included in cluster ignores PCS CLI at least via my experience ( which is obviously limited

either format of particular commands is wrong for QuickStart )

I believe that dropping (complete replacing ) instack-virt-setup is not a good idea in general. Personally, I believe that like in case with packstack it is always good

to have VENV configuration been tested before going to bare metal deployment.

My major concern is maintenance and disaster recovery tests , rather then deployment itself . What good is for me TripleO Quickstart running on bare metal if I cannot replace

crashed VM Controller just been limited to Services HA ( all 3 Cluster VMs running on single

bare metal node )



rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list redhat com

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]