[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] centos-release-openstack-mitaka

So, how exactly newer packages get into CentOS repo?  I see about 7 newer versions of the os-net-config in various repos, ranging between versions 0.2.2 and 5.0.0.  RHEL OSP errata updates to 0.2.3, I believe.

Is there a place I can check to find out when os-net-config package will get updated in CentOS repo?   Do CentOS repos follow RHEL updates and errata?

Image creation is a very important subject, but if there is no stable repo, no matter what process is used to create images, they will be as good as the repo the packages are pulled from :)


-----Original Message-----
From: rdo-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:rdo-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Christopher Brown
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:59 AM
To: mrunge redhat com; rdo-list redhat com
Subject: Re: [rdo-list] centos-release-openstack-mitaka

Hi Matthias,

On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 07:35 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 15/08/16 21:59, Christopher Brown wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilja,
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 17:08 +0100, Ilja Maslov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> >
> > I think the idea with the CentOS repo is that it only gets updated 
> > with when upstream release an update. But there doesn't seem to be 
> > any CI that tests whether this setup actually works.
> >
> > I have added this as a topic for Wednesday's IRC meeting:
> >
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting
> >
> > but it is unlikely I will be able to attend this as I will be 
> > travelling.
> >
> Thank you for your feedback, it really helps. If you have the feeling, 
> nobody listening, that's wrong.

Thanks, much appreciated. I am very keen to be part of a fix for this.
We do our fair share of OSP and RDO deployments and both have their quirks but the ability to re-use config across both means that the RDO/OSP model works very well for us.

> Please share your experience, where you had to pin versions etc. It 
> would be good to avoid others running into the same issues and to 
> stabilize quicker.

Last time I think trown made fairly obvious suggestion that a bugzilla at least would be good, therefore:


to which ggillies compiled a good response here:


but I have yet to see any feedback (I think it was a holiday in the US yesterday?)

This is where we have pinned galera to the earlier working version Graeme identified.

The keystone v3 error we have not logged as we have reverted temporarily to v2 to carry out tempest tests. I will file a bug for that once we replicate this again.

> About CI, other folks might want to comment on the state.

I think really the issue is with building the images here. The stable "openstack overcloud image build" doesn't appear to get tested as this is broken. When I followed the "Install from Mitaka branch"
instructions here:


it pulled in packages from newton-testing, though that could have been an error on my part.

I think what would be good would be to know who to contact, file bugs, submit patches etc for the stable branch.

> Matthias
> --
> Matthias Runge <mrunge redhat com>
> Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, 
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing 
> Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
>                     Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com

Christopher Brown

rdo-list mailing list
rdo-list redhat com

To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]