[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] Updated mitaka stable images for tripleo



On 20/08/16 09:52, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> We would need to setup yet another pipeline.  I can go after that if
> there is a need and it sounds like there is.  I'll reduce the cadence on
> some of the other jobs to compensate.

Yes I think it would be much appreciated if such a pipeline could be
setup. Even just to rebuild once a month would be great.

> 
> We are already chewing up quite a bit of the ci.centos.org
> <http://ci.centos.org> infra,  KB we may need to sync up regarding
> storage and network bandwidth.  

Understood, hopefully as we get RDO Cloud online that will help open up
the resourcing bottleneck.

Regards,

Graeme

> 
> I'll wait for KB's ack before proceeding.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Sent from my mobile
> 
> 
> On Aug 18, 2016 05:05, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies redhat com
> <mailto:ggillies redhat com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 18/08/16 18:45, Haïkel wrote:
>     > 2016-08-18 9:42 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gillies <ggillies redhat com
>     <mailto:ggillies redhat com>>:
>     >> On 18/08/16 17:14, Haïkel wrote:
>     >>> 2016-08-18 6:06 GMT+02:00 Hugh Brock <hbrock redhat com
>     <mailto:hbrock redhat com>>:
>     >>>> On Aug 18, 2016 5:48 AM, "Graeme Gillies" <ggillies redhat com
>     <mailto:ggillies redhat com>> wrote:
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Hi,
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> In a follow up to my previous post about image building in
>     tripleo/RDO,
>     >>>>> do we currently have a timeline, process, or anything else
>     regarding
>     >>>>> when rebuilt tripleo images are rebuilt and uploaded to
>     >>>>> buildlogs.centos.org <http://buildlogs.centos.org>? E.g. if
>     you look at the mitaka images
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>
>     http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/
>     <http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/cbs/>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> They were built back in April. Can we get something in place
>     to have
>     >>>>> them updated more frequently?
>     >>>>>
>     >>>
>     >>> https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/
>     <https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/>
>     >>
>     >> If you look under the mitaka directory at this link, you will
>     notice the
>     >> only directory there is delorean.
>     >>
>     >> I'm not talking about delorean, I'm not interested in that. I'm
>     >> interested in images built using the package manifests from
>     >> centos-release-openstack-mitaka and its dependencies (Ceph,
>     qemu-ev, etc).
>     >>
>     >> The images at the link I gave originally are images that were
>     built with
>     >> those CBS, non-delorean, repos
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >>
>     >> Graeme
>     >>
>     >
>     > The thing is there's no automation to periodically rebuild and test
>     > those images.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > H.
> 
>     Ok no problem, now we have identified that, how can we go about getting
>     some automation to do this? It would ideally happen everytime we ship a
>     new package in those official channels, but failing, that, could we do
>     this periodically?
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>     Graeme
> 
>     >
>     >>>
>     >>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Graeme
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> --
>     >>>>> Graeme Gillies
>     >>>>> Principal Systems Administrator
>     >>>>> Openstack Infrastructure
>     >>>>> Red Hat Australia
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>>> rdo-list mailing list
>     >>>>> rdo-list redhat com <mailto:rdo-list redhat com>
>     >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Graeme thanks for raising this.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> RDO folks, should we not be building images every time we
>     promote? If we are
>     >>>> doing that, should we not be linking them more obviously?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> -Hugh
>     >>>>
>     >>>
>     >>> Seems like sync is broken.
>     >>>
>     >>> @KB; maybe, I'm missing some context but since John is in PTO,
>     can you
>     >>> look at it?
>     >>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697
>     <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10697>
>     >>>
>     >>> Regards,
>     >>> H.
>     >>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> rdo-list mailing list
>     >>>> rdo-list redhat com <mailto:rdo-list redhat com>
>     >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> Graeme Gillies
>     >> Principal Systems Administrator
>     >> Openstack Infrastructure
>     >> Red Hat Australia
> 
> 
>     --
>     Graeme Gillies
>     Principal Systems Administrator
>     Openstack Infrastructure
>     Red Hat Australia
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     rdo-list mailing list
>     rdo-list redhat com <mailto:rdo-list redhat com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list>
> 
>     To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>     <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com>
> 
> 


-- 
Graeme Gillies
Principal Systems Administrator
Openstack Infrastructure
Red Hat Australia


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]