[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] [Arm-dev] next steps for altarch with ceph and openstack



2016-07-07 17:41 GMT+02:00 Jim Perrin <jperrin centos org>:
>
>
> On 07/07/2016 03:26 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 05.07.2016 o 18:38, George Dunlap pisze:
>>> On 05/07/16 16:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>>> W dniu 05.07.2016 o 16:28, Jim Perrin pisze:
>>>>> With the work that Marcin has done for openstack on aarch64, as well
>>>>> as the ceph builds, we need to begin working a plan for publishing
>>>>> these builds to a mirror. I'd like to identify the steps needed, and
>>>>> the ownership for those steps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas please correct/update these as needed
>>>>
>>>> Added few people to Cc: from pre-RH summit threads.
>>>>
>>>>> 1. new tag in cbs for aarch64 build, with modified dist for mitaka.
>>>>> Will ceph need this as well?
>>>>
>>>>> 2. If we wish to re-use the centos-release-openstack-mitaka noarch,
>>>>> dependencies of centos-release-ceph-hammer, centos-release-qemu-ev,
>>>>> centos-release-storage-common, and centos-release-virt-common need
>>>>> to be addressed.
>>>>
>>>> It would be good to populate all those repositories. I opened bugs for
>>>> all tags:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11084 (openstack)
>>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11085 (ceph)
>>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11086 (virt/kvm-common)
>>>
>>> I looked at this bug, but I couldn't tell exactly what packages you
>>> wanted in here, and why the existing KVM packages weren't sufficient.
>>> Could you just sketch out a brief summary?
>>
>> You are right. I am sometimes still lost in CentOS repository structure.
>>
>> What is in x86-64 virt/kvm-common repository is present in os/ one for
>> aarch64 already. Only qemu-kvm-ev update (2.7.1 -> 2.10.1) would be nice
>> to have.
>
> We can pull this in.
>
>> So we can kill that dependency from centos-release-openstack-mitaka
>> package. Added note to the bug (I lack permissions to close it as notabug).
>
>
> I might suggest that for now (until we get the mirror bits sorted), we
> create a centos-release-mitaka-altarch package. This would avoid needing
> to mess with the existing x86_64 bits. once everything is aligned, then
> we can obsolete/provides the replacement and use the standard package
> across all architectures.
>

Works for me.

>
>
> --
> Jim Perrin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]