[rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable version?
Pedro Sousa
pgsousa at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 09:33:15 UTC 2016
Hi Graeme,
I ran introspection several times and didn't have the problem you
mentioned. Always worked fine.
However I did have problems with my generated overcloud images:
"Could not retrieve fact='rabbitmq_nodename',
resolution='<anonymous>':
undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass Could not retrieve
fact='rabbitmq_nodename', resolution='<anonymous>': undefined
method `' for nil:NilClass"
After downloading the delorean generated images the problem was gone.
Regards,
Pedro Sousa
How
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Graeme Gillies <ggillies at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/16 10:26, Pedro Sousa wrote:
> > Hi Graeme,
> >
> > my 2 cents here, my experience was different from yours.
> >
> > I've managed to install tripleo with 3 controllers + 3 computes without
> > epel repos and without applying any patches, using mitaka repos from
> > cbs. I didn't have any issues with introspection, but I tested on the
> > same hw (Dell PowerEdge R430). Then I downloaded some prebuild overcloud
> > images from delorean
> > repos:
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/delorean/
> >
> > That being said, there's a lot to be done concerning install
> > documentation, and how to report bugs and issues, specifically for
> > baremetal environments, where a lot of people like me intend to use
> > tripleo for production.
> >
> > Regards
>
> The patch I note in step 4) is to work around an issue that only affects
> you if you introspect a node more than once. It will always work the
> first time, it's the second time that it will fail. So if you are only
> introspecting once then you don't need it.
>
> The patch I apply in step 5) is to work around an issue that is fixed in
> DLRN, and is only necessary if you want to build images yourself and not
> use prebuilt ones. By using prebuilt ones from DLRN, you are in effect
> getting the fix by nature of that (and thus don't need the patch).
>
> Note that if you are also sourcing your overcloud-full.qcow2 from DLRN
> repos, then you are no longer deploying an overcloud that uses CBS, you
> are deploying an overcloud from DLRN. You can confirm this by checking
> if the rdo-release rpm is installed on your overcloud, and check that in
> /etc/yum.repos.d there is no 'delorean.repo'
>
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Graeme Gillies <ggillies at redhat.com
> > <mailto:ggillies at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to say I have been following this thread quite closely
> and
> > can sympathize with some of the pain people are going through to get
> > tripleO to work.
> >
> > Currently it's quite difficult and a bit opaque on how to actually
> > utilise the stable mitaka repos in order to build a functional
> > undercloud and overcloud environment.
> >
> > First I wanted to share the steps I have undergone in order to get a
> > functional overcloud working with RDO Mitaka utilising the RDO stable
> > release built by CentOS, and then I'll talk about some specific
> steps I
> > think need to be undertaken by the RDO/TripleO team in order to
> provide
> > a better experience in the future.
> >
> > To get a functional overcloud using RDO Mitaka, you need to do the
> > following
> >
> > 1) Install EPEL on your undercloud
> > 2) Install https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm on your
> > undercloud
> > 3) Following the normal steps to install your undercloud (modifying
> > undercloud.conf, and running openstack undercloud install
> > 4) You will now need to manually patch ironic on the undercloud in
> order
> > to make sure repeated introspection works. This might not be needed
> if
> > you don't do any introspection, but I find more often than not you
> end
> > up having to do it, so it's worthwhile. The bug you need to patch is
> [1]
> > and I typically run the following commands to apply the patch
> >
> > # sudo su -
> > $ cd /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> > $ curl
> > '
> https://review.openstack.org/changes/306421/revisions/abd50d8438e7d371ce24f97d8f8f67052b562007/patch?download
> '
> > | base64 -d | patch -p1
> > $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector
> > $ systemctl restart openstack-ironic-inspector-dnsmasq
> > $ exit
> > #
> >
> > 5) Manually patch the undercloud to build overcloud images using
> > rhos-release rpm only (which utilises the stable Mitaka repo from
> > CentOS, and nothing from RDO Trunk [delorean]). I do this by
> modifying
> > the file
> >
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/tripleoclient/v1/overcloud_image.py
> >
> > At around line 467 you will see a reference to epel, I add a new line
> > after that to include the rdo_release DIB element to the build as
> well.
> > This typically makes the file look something like
> >
> > http://paste.openstack.org/show/508196/
> >
> > (note like 468). Then I create a directory to store my images and
> build
> > them specifying the mitaka version of rdo_release. I then upload
> these
> > images
> >
> > # mkdir ~/images
> > # cd ~/images
> > # export RDO_RELEASE=mitaka
> > # openstack overcloud image build --all
> > # openstack overcloud image upload --update-existing
> >
> > 6) Because of the bug at [2] which affects the ironic agent ramdisk,
> we
> > need to build a set of images utilising RDO Trunk for the mitaka
> branch
> > (where the fix is applied), and then upload *only* the new ironic
> > ramdisk. This is done with
> >
> > # mkdir ~/images-mitaka-trunk
> > # cd ~/images-mitaka-trunk
> > # export USE_DELOREAN_TRUNK=1
> > # export
> > DELOREAN_TRUNK_REPO="
> http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-mitaka/current/"
> > # export DELOREAN_REPO_FILE="delorean.repo"
> > # openstack overcloud image build --type agent-ramdisk
> > # sudo cp ironic-python-agent.initramfs /httpboot/agent.ramdisk
> >
> > 7) Follow the rest of the documentation to deploy the overcloud
> normally
> >
> > Please note that obviously your mileage may vary, and this is by all
> > means not an exclusive list of the problems. I have however used
> these
> > steps to do multiple node deployments (10+ nodes) with HA over
> different
> > hardware sets with different networking setups (single nic, multiple
> nic
> > with bonding + vlans).
> >
> > With all the different repos floating around, all which change very
> > rapidly, combined with the documentation defaults targeting
> developers
> > and CI systems (not end users), it's hard to not only get a stable
> > TripleO install up, but also communicate and discuss clearly with
> others
> > what is working, what is broken, and how to compare two
> installations to
> > see if they are experiencing the same issues.
> >
> > To this end I would like to suggest to the RDO and TripleO community
> > that we undertake the following
> >
> > 1) Overhaul all the TripleO documentation so that all the steps
> default
> > to utilising/deploying using RDO Stable (that is, the releases done
> by
> > CBS). There should be colored boxes with alt steps for those who
> wish to
> > use RDO Trunk on the stable branch, and RDO Trunk from master. This
> > basically inverts the current pattern. I think anyone, Operator or
> > developer, who is working through the documentation for the first
> time,
> > should be given steps that maximise the chance of success, and thus
> the
> > most stable release we have. Once a user has gone through the process
> > once, they can look at the alternative steps for more aggressive
> > releases
> >
> > 2) Patch python-tripleoclient so that by default, when you run
> > "openstack overcloud image build" it builds the images utilising the
> > rdo_release DIB element, and sets the RDO_RELEASE environment
> variable
> > to be 'mitaka' or whenever the current stable release is (and we
> should
> > endevour to update it with new releases). There should be no extra
> > environment variables necessary to build images, and by default it
> > should never touch anything RDO Trunk (delorean) related
> >
> > 3) For bugs like the two I have mentioned above, we need to have some
> > sort of robust process for either backporting those patches to the
> > builds in CBS (I understand we don't do this for various reasons),
> or we
> > need some kind of tooling or solution that allows operators to apply
> > only the fixes they need from RDO Trunk (delorean). We need to ensure
> > that when an Operator utilises TripleO they have the greatest chance
> of
> > success, and bugs such as these which severely impact the deployment
> > process harm the adoption of TripleO and RDO.
> >
> > 4) We should curate and keep an up to date page on rdoproject.org
> > <http://rdoproject.org> that
> > does highlight the outstanding issues related to TripleO on the RDO
> > Stable (CBS) releases. These should have links to relevant bugzillas,
> > clean instructions on how to work around the issue, or cleanly apply
> a
> > patch to avoid the issue, and as new releases make it out, we should
> > update the page to drop off workarounds that are no longer needed.
> >
> > The goal is to push Operators/Users to working with our most stable
> code
> > as much as possible, and track/curate issues around that. This way
> > everyone should be on the same page, issues are easier to discuss and
> > diagnose, and overall peoples experiences should be better.
> >
> > I'm interested in thoughts, feedback, and concerns, both from the RDO
> > and TripleO community, and from the Operator/User community.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Graeme
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+bug/1570447
> > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322892
> >
> > On 05/06/16 02:04, Pedro Sousa wrote:
> > > Thanks Marius,
> > >
> > > I can confirm that it installs fine with 3 controllers + 3 computes
> > > after recreating the stack
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Marius Cornea <
> marius at remote-lab.net <mailto:marius at remote-lab.net>
> > > <mailto:marius at remote-lab.net <mailto:marius at remote-lab.net>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pedro,
> > >
> > > Scaling out controller nodes is not supported at this moment:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243312
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Pedro Sousa <pgsousa at gmail.com
> <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > some update on scaling the cloud:
> > > >
> > > > 1 controller + 1 compute -> 1 controller + 3 computes OK
> > > >
> > > > 1 controller + 3 computes -> 3 controllers + 3 compute FAILS
> > > >
> > > > Problem: The new controller nodes are "stuck" in "pscd
> start", so
> > > it seems
> > > > to be a problem joining the pacemaker cluster... Did anyone
> had this
> > > > problem?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Pedro Sousa <
> pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I finally managed to install a baremetal in mitaka with 1
> > > controller + 1
> > > >> compute with network isolation. Thank god :)
> > > >>
> > > >> All I did was:
> > > >>
> > > >> #yum install centos-release-openstack-mitaka
> > > >> #sudo yum install python-tripleoclient
> > > >>
> > > >> without epel repos.
> > > >>
> > > >> Then followed instructions from Redhat Site.
> > > >>
> > > >> I downloaded the overcloud images from:
> > > >>
> > >
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/tripleo_images/mitaka/delorean/
> > > >>
> > > >> I do have an issue that forces me to delete a json file and
> run
> > > >> os-refresh-config inside my overcloud nodes other than that
> it
> > > installs
> > > >> fine.
> > > >>
> > > >> Now I'll test with more 2 controllers + 2 computes to have
> a full HA
> > > >> deployment.
> > > >>
> > > >> If anyone needs help to document this I'll be happy to help.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Pedro Sousa
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ronelle Landy <
> rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The report says: "Fix Released" as of 2016-05-24.
> > > >>> Are you installing on a clean system with the latest
> repositories?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Might also want to check your version of rabbitmq: I have
> > > >>> rabbitmq-server-3.6.2-3.el7.noarch on CentOS 7.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:
> pgsousa at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>>
> > > >>> > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:
> rlandy at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:
> cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>>,
> "Ignacio Bravo"
> > > >>> > <ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
> > <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>>,
> > "rdo-list"
> > > >>> > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 1:20:43 PM
> > > >>> > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable version?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Anyway to workaround this? Maybe downgrade hiera?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Ronelle Landy
> > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > I am not sure exactly where you installed from, and
> when you
> > > did your
> > > >>> > > installation, but any chance, you've hit:
> > > >>> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1584892?
> > > >>> > > There is a link bugzilla record.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:
> pgsousa at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:
> rlandy at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:
> cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>>,
> "Ignacio Bravo" <
> > > >>> > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
> > <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>>,
> > > "rdo-list"
> > > >>> > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 12:26:58 PM
> > > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
> version?
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Thanks Ronelle,
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > do you think this kind of errors can be related with
> network
> > > >>> > > > settings?
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > "Could not retrieve fact='rabbitmq_nodename',
> > > >>> > > > resolution='<anonymous>':
> > > >>> > > > undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass Could not
> retrieve
> > > >>> > > > fact='rabbitmq_nodename', resolution='<anonymous>':
> undefined
> > > >>> > > > method `[]'
> > > >>> > > > for nil:NilClass"
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ronelle Landy
> > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Hi Pedro,
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > You could use the docs you referred to.
> > > >>> > > > > Alternatively, if you want to use a vm for the
> > > undercloud and
> > > >>> > > > > baremetal
> > > >>> > > > > machines for the overcloud, it is possible to use
> Tripleo
> > > >>> > > > > Qucikstart
> > > >>> > > with a
> > > >>> > > > > few modifications.
> > > >>> > > > >
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo-quickstart/+bug/1571028.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> > > > > > From: "Pedro Sousa" <pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:
> pgsousa at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > > > To: "Ronelle Landy" <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:
> rlandy at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > > > Cc: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
> <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>>,
> "Ignacio Bravo" <
> > > >>> > > > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:
> ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
> > <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>>,
> > > "rdo-list"
> > > >>> > > > > > <rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com
> >
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 11:48:38 AM
> > > >>> > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo stable
> version?
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > Hi Ronelle,
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > maybe I understand it wrong but I thought that
> Tripleo
> > > >>> > > > > > Quickstart
> > > >>> > > was for
> > > >>> > > > > > deploying virtual environments?
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > And for baremetal we should use
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > >
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/installation/installation.html
> > > >>> > > > > > ?
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > Thanks
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Ronelle Landy
> > > >>> > > > > > <rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com <mailto:rlandy at redhat.com>>>
> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > We have had success deploying RDO (Mitaka) on
> baremetal
> > > >>> > > > > > > systems -
> > > >>> > > using
> > > >>> > > > > > > Tripleo Quickstart with both single-nic-vlans
> and
> > > >>> > > > > > > bond-with-vlans
> > > >>> > > > > network
> > > >>> > > > > > > isolation configurations.
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > Baremetal can have some complicated networking
> > > issues but,
> > > >>> > > > > > > from
> > > >>> > > > > previous
> > > >>> > > > > > > experiences, if a single-controller deployment
> > > worked but a
> > > >>> > > > > > > HA
> > > >>> > > > > deployment
> > > >>> > > > > > > did not, I would check:
> > > >>> > > > > > > - does the HA deployment command include: -e
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > >
> /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/puppet-pacemaker.yaml
> > > >>> > > > > > > - are there possible MTU issues?
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> > > > > > > > From: "Christopher Brown" <cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk
> <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co.uk>>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > To: pgsousa at gmail.com
> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com> <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com
> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>,
> > > ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>
> > <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com <mailto:ibravo at ltgfederal.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Cc: rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com> <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 10:29:39 AM
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Baremetal Tripleo
> stable
> > > version?
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Hello Ignacio,
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for your response and good to know it
> > isn't
> > > just me!
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > I would be more than happy to provide
> > developers with
> > > >>> > > > > > > > access to
> > > >>> > > our
> > > >>> > > > > > > > bare metal environments. I'll also file some
> > bugzilla
> > > >>> > > > > > > > reports to
> > > >>> > > see
> > > >>> > > > > if
> > > >>> > > > > > > > this generates any interest.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Please do let me know if you make any
> > progress - I am
> > > >>> > > > > > > > trying to
> > > >>> > > > > deploy
> > > >>> > > > > > > > HA with network isolation, multiple nics and
> > vlans.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > The RDO web page states:
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > "If you want to create a production-ready
> cloud,
> > > you'll
> > > >>> > > > > > > > want to
> > > >>> > > use
> > > >>> > > > > the
> > > >>> > > > > > > > TripleO quickstart guide."
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > which is a contradiction in terms really.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 14:30 +0100, Ignacio
> Bravo
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Pedro / Christopher,
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to share with you that I also
> had
> > > plenty of
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > issues
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > deploying on bare metal HA servers, and
> have
> > > paused the
> > > >>> > > deployment
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > using TripleO until better winds start to
> flow
> > > here. I
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > was
> > > >>> > > able to
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > deploy the QuickStart, but on bare metal
> the
> > > history was
> > > >>> > > different.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Couldn't even deploy a two server
> > configuration.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking that it would be good to
> > have the
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > developers
> > > >>> > > have
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > access to one of our environments and go
> > through
> > > a full
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > install
> > > >>> > > > > with
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > us to better see where things fail. We can
> > do this
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > handholding
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > deployment once every week/month based on
> > > developers time
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > availability. That way we can get a working
> > > install, and
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > we can
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > troubleshoot real life environment
> problems.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > IB
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:15 AM, Pedro Sousa
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > <pgsousa at gmail.com
> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com> <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com
> > <mailto:pgsousa at gmail.com>>>
> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Yes. I've used this, but I'll try again
> as there's
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > seems to
> > > >>> > > be
> > > >>> > > > > new
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > updates.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Stable Branch Skip all repos mentioned
> above,
> > > other
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > than
> > > >>> > > epel-
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > release which is still required.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable latest RDO Stable Delorean
> repository
> > > for all
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > packages
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
> > > /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-liberty.repo
> > > >>> > > > > https://trunk.r
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo
> > <http://doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo>
> > > <http://doproject.org/centos7-liberty/current/delorean.repo>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Enable the Delorean Deps repository
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > sudo curl -o
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> /etc/yum.repos.d/delorean-deps-liberty.repo
> > > >>> > > > > http://tru
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo
> > <http://nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo>
> > > <http://nk.rdoproject.org/centos7-liberty/delorean-deps.repo>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM,
> Christopher
> > > Brown <
> > > >>> > > > > cbrown2 at ocf.co <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co>
> > <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co <mailto:cbrown2 at ocf.co>>.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > uk> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > No, Liberty deployed ok for us.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > It suggests to me a package mismatch.
> Have you
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > completely
> > > >>> > > > > rebuilt
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > undercloud and then the images using
> Liberty?
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 11:04 +0100,
> Pedro
> > > Sousa wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > AttributeError: 'module' object has
> no
> > > attribute
> > > >>> > > 'PortOpt'
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
> > > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk
> > <http://www.ocf.co.uk> <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk
> > <http://blog.ocf.co.uk> <http://blog.ocf.co.uk>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to an
> OCF
> > > Support
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > request
> > > >>> > > must
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > always
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk <mailto:
> support at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk>> for a
> > ticket number to
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > >>> > > > > generated
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > or
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be updated.
> > > Should this
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > not be
> > > >>> > > done
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > then OCF
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for
> > requests not
> > > dealt
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > with in a
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > timely
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > manner.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in
> England
> > > and Wales.
> > > >>> > > > > Registered
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > number
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
> > > Registered office
> > > >>> > > address:
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > OCF plc,
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe
> > Park,
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Chapeltown,
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Sheffield S35
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > 2PG.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > If you have received this message in
> > error,
> > > please
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > notify
> > > >>> > > us
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your
> > system.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com> <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:
> rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > --
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Christopher Brown
> > > >>> > > > > > > > OpenStack Engineer
> > > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Tel: +44 (0)114 257 2200
> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
> > > <tel:%2B44%20%280%29114%20257%202200>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Web: www.ocf.co.uk <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
> > <http://www.ocf.co.uk>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Blog: blog.ocf.co.uk <http://blog.ocf.co.uk>
> > <http://blog.ocf.co.uk>
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Twitter: @ocfplc
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Please note, any emails relating to an OCF
> Support
> > > request
> > > >>> > > > > > > > must
> > > >>> > > > > always
> > > >>> > > > > > > > be sent to support at ocf.co.uk <mailto:
> support at ocf.co.uk>
> > > <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk <mailto:support at ocf.co.uk>> for a
> > ticket number to be
> > > >>> > > generated or
> > > >>> > > > > > > > existing support ticket to be updated.
> > Should this
> > > not be
> > > >>> > > > > > > > done
> > > >>> > > then
> > > >>> > > > > OCF
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > cannot be held responsible for requests not
> > dealt
> > > with in a
> > > >>> > > timely
> > > >>> > > > > > > > manner.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > OCF plc is a company registered in England
> > and Wales.
> > > >>> > > > > > > > Registered
> > > >>> > > > > number
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > 4132533, VAT number GB 780 6803 14.
> > Registered office
> > > >>> > > > > > > > address:
> > > >>> > > OCF
> > > >>> > > > > plc,
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > 5 Rotunda Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park,
> > > Chapeltown,
> > > >>> > > Sheffield
> > > >>> > > > > S35
> > > >>> > > > > > > > 2PG.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > If you have received this message in error,
> > please
> > > notify
> > > >>> > > > > > > > us
> > > >>> > > > > > > > immediately and remove it from your system.
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list mailing list
> > > >>> > > > > > > > rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com> <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:
> rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>>
> > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rdo-list mailing list
> > > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>>
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com <mailto:
> rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rdo-list mailing list
> > > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com <mailto:
> rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Graeme Gillies
> > Principal Systems Administrator
> > Openstack Infrastructure
> > Red Hat Australia
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdo-list mailing list
> > rdo-list at redhat.com <mailto:rdo-list at redhat.com>
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> >
> > To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rdo-list-unsubscribe at redhat.com>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Graeme Gillies
> Principal Systems Administrator
> Openstack Infrastructure
> Red Hat Australia
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/attachments/20160606/82f80a9d/attachment.htm>
More information about the rdo-list
mailing list