[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] Packstack refactor and future ideas




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan Pevec" <apevec redhat com>
> To: "Ivan Chavero" <ichavero redhat com>
> Cc: "rdo-list" <rdo-list redhat com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 5:48:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [rdo-list] Packstack refactor and future ideas
> 
> > I don't agree with this, we can set the untested features as "experimental"
> or "unsupported"
> 
> Best is to remove them to make that clear, because no matter what
> deprecation warnings you put[*] people will keep using features until
> they're gone, giving us bug reports to take care of and without CI to
> verify fixes.
> It's long-term maintenance burden I am concerned about, for features
> which are clearly out of scope.

I understand this, my concern is that if we remove this feature we will leave
users with no tool for doing multinode in a lightweight way and this might
drive off users from testing/adopting RDO.

I'm willing to create CI tests for multinode Packstack in order to maintain
this features.

And believe me it would be easier for me just to drop this features but i really
think users are benefiting from this features.

Cheers,
Ivan


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]