On 07/12/2017 02:36 PM, Leif Madsen wrote:
> 1) Just leave them where they are now, and start fresh. This is easier,
> but potentially "loses" history. (That is, it'll still be there, but
> less obvious where to find it.)
> Would it be easy-ish to simply link from the new archives page to the
> old archives? We'd have a split-brain, but honestly it's probably
> already archived in various search engines, and a handy link would make
> it clear how to access the old archives.
Sure. I expect we can do that. And then, perhaps we could even import
the archives once that bug gets fixed.