[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] ceph-ansible auto builds in cbs.centos.org

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Ken Dreyer <kdreyer redhat com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> TL;DR new ceph-ansible tags are automatically built in the CentOS Storage SIG.
> The RDO team members have been building ceph-related RPMs in the
> CentOS Storage SIG, including ceph-ansible. Specifically this has been
> handled by Giulio Fidente and John Fulton on the OpenStack (RDO/OSP)
> team.
> The reason is that TripleO relies on ceph-ansible to install Ceph, and
> TripleO expects to install a ceph-ansible RPM. So RDO depends on the
> ceph-ansible CBS builds.
> In the past Giulio had been doing these CentOS builds by hand,
> rebuilding upstream SRPMs from shaman.ceph.com, for example
> http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=19762
> I have a job running in an internal Jenkins instance that now polls
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible every hour and builds any new Git
> tags within CBS. An example is
> http://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=227958 , although that was
> "scratch = True", and future builds will not be scratch builds. It is
> using the script at https://github.com/ktdreyer/ceph-ansible-cbs

Thanks for working on this Ken.

For which repos are you doing this? I.e. what subset of the following
is this now the case for?

 echo ceph-{jewel,luminous}-{release,testing,candidate}

TripleO CI uses ceph-ansible from centos-jewel (release) for the
voting job scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, so I'd rather we
didn't promote from testing to release until we know that
scenario001-multinode-oooq-container is passing with the new
ceph-ansible (otherwise we could break TripleO CI).

One way to test this is to have a submission which varies the line
below to use not ceph-jewel but ceph-jewel-testing (though there is no



> Next steps:
> - automatically tag new builds into storage7-ceph-luminous-testing
> - automatically tag new builds into storage7-ceph-luminous-release
> Anyone in RDO have suggestions for how we should gate these next CBS
> tagging operations? My simple approach was going to be "tag into
> -testing immediately, then wait two weeks and tag into -release". If
> there is a simple way to have safer, automatic gating here, I'm open
> to that.
> - Ken
> _______________________________________________
> rdo-list mailing list
> rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]