Samba Upgrade Issue

Chris Morton cmorton at newsguy.com
Thu Apr 8 23:54:08 UTC 2004


Rick Stevens wrote:

> Chris Morton wrote:
>
>> Rick Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rick Stevens wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Over the weekend, I upgraded my server from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the most part, everything runs.  There is a major problem 
>>>>>> however.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running Samba 2.2.x.  When I did the upgrade, I no longer 
>>>>>> had access to my home directory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After finally finding some useful documentation, it appears that 
>>>>>> 3.x is VASTLY different from 2.x.  I THINK the issue relates to 
>>>>>> LDAP, but I don't know anything about LDAP, and I haven't gotten 
>>>>>> far enough into the documentation to make heads or tails of 
>>>>>> what's really going on.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you'll find that the difference is in the security.  Samba 
>>>>> 2.x
>>>>> used "security = share" by default, 3.x uses "security = user". 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> I solved both problems earlier today.
>>>>
>>>> I use my Samba as a PDC, so I already have "security=user".  The 
>>>> problem was with this line in the [homes] share:
>>>>
>>>> "valid users = %S"
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, this is not permitted in Samba 3.x.  Commenting it out 
>>>> solved that problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm.  Interesting.  Did testparm kick the line out?
>>
>>
>>
>> Nope.
>
>
> Hmmm.  Then it's still valid.  Do the Windows users have a Linux
> account or mapped via a usermap.cfg file?  They don't have an individual 

All users have a Linux account.

>
> [username] service associated, do they? 

No.

Thanks.







More information about the Redhat-install-list mailing list