Samba Upgrade Issue
Chris Morton
cmorton at newsguy.com
Thu Apr 8 23:54:08 UTC 2004
Rick Stevens wrote:
> Chris Morton wrote:
>
>> Rick Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rick Stevens wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Chris Morton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Over the weekend, I upgraded my server from RedHat 7.3 to Fedora.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the most part, everything runs. There is a major problem
>>>>>> however.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running Samba 2.2.x. When I did the upgrade, I no longer
>>>>>> had access to my home directory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After finally finding some useful documentation, it appears that
>>>>>> 3.x is VASTLY different from 2.x. I THINK the issue relates to
>>>>>> LDAP, but I don't know anything about LDAP, and I haven't gotten
>>>>>> far enough into the documentation to make heads or tails of
>>>>>> what's really going on.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you'll find that the difference is in the security. Samba
>>>>> 2.x
>>>>> used "security = share" by default, 3.x uses "security = user".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> I solved both problems earlier today.
>>>>
>>>> I use my Samba as a PDC, so I already have "security=user". The
>>>> problem was with this line in the [homes] share:
>>>>
>>>> "valid users = %S"
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, this is not permitted in Samba 3.x. Commenting it out
>>>> solved that problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm. Interesting. Did testparm kick the line out?
>>
>>
>>
>> Nope.
>
>
> Hmmm. Then it's still valid. Do the Windows users have a Linux
> account or mapped via a usermap.cfg file? They don't have an individual
All users have a Linux account.
>
> [username] service associated, do they?
No.
Thanks.
More information about the Redhat-install-list
mailing list