linux ext2 or ext3...

Manuel Arostegui Ramirez manuaroste at yahoo.es
Sat Apr 17 19:49:09 UTC 2004


 --- pamntom <pamntom at sbcglobal.net> escribió: > Ha!
Found a FAQ page for the explanation:
>
http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html
> I will go with linux ext3. My question is still out
> there for anyone's
> help though. What's the best partition considering
> my goal?
>  
>    These are my options using Partition magic (v8)
> as I am about to
> begin with an installation of RH9: FAT - NTFS -
> Linux ext2 - Linux ext3
> - Linux swap.
> What are the differences? Don't need swap space
> (yet), so I am down to
> four options. I am going to assume that I want
> linux, but which
> partition choice?
> I have a new Dell workstation (Precision 450)
> running EXP, and I plan to
> have a dual boot WXP/RH9 using Grub as my loader,
> and samba to talk to
> my other NT systems. Also: I have a low-end ATI
> video card, as a default
> for now.
>  
> Any suggestions? (Haven't purchased Partition Magic
> yet, just demo, so
> please let me know if there's something else,
> something better.Grub,
> too.)
>  
> Tom Allen
> (no worries, no rush. - this is just weekend fun!...
> At least, this is
> what I keep telling myself . )
> 

FAT - NTFS - Linux ext2 - Linux ext3?

I choose ext3 without dude.
But, personaly i prefer ReiserFS as file system.
You can choose it or anyone above, in your RH9
installation menú.

Cheers


=====
--

Manuel Aróstegui Linux user 200896
http://manuel.todo-linux.com


	
	
		
__________________________________________
Correo Yahoo! - 6MB de espacio ¡Gratis!
http://correo.yahoo.es





More information about the Redhat-install-list mailing list