Disk space issue during install.
Rick Stevens
rstevens at vitalstream.com
Thu Apr 22 16:39:38 UTC 2004
Jon Goodridge wrote:
> Rick,
>
> Thanks for your help. I finally got RH9 to load by deleting the
> partition and letting install set up what it wanted in the free space.
> I ended up with a 100MB "/boot" and a 3.9GB root "/" partition. Does
> Red Hat require /boot to be separate partition from "/" ?
No, it doesn't _require_ it.
> Anyway I was able to install RH9, but it would not boot. Most
> likely I have something wrong in lilo.conf. linux on /boot went fine,
> but then I kept getting read-only on "/".
With Mandrake in the mix, the odds are that your RH system is trying to
mount Mandrake's "/" (depends on if Mandrake set up filesystem labels
and lilo picked up Mandrake's instead of RH's.
> I now have more serious problems. I decided to delete the install
> (it was a minimum install for testing anyway). I deleted the RH9
> partition. Now my partition table has become corrupted. Disk Druid
> can't read it and bombs. I put osl2000 on the drive just to see if it
> could read the partition table. osl2000 saw the Mandrake 10.0
> partitions, however, when I tried to boot Mandrake lilo gave me:
>
> "L99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99........." for about 1/3 of
> the screen and then died.
>
> So are there any partition wizards out there who can help ?
Sounds like a partition didn't start or end on a cylinder boundry. An
"L" followed by digits usually indicates a geometry problem between
what lilo thinks and what the BIOS reports. Did you change any BIOS
settings by accident (e.g. turned off LBA mode)?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- When in doubt, mumble. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Redhat-install-list
mailing list