Redhat-install-list Digest, Vol 4, Issue 24
hari sirigibathina
harikaforredhat at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 24 13:28:14 UTC 2004
Hi All,
Iam a new bee in our mailing list and feel very happy to associate with Uall. I was following the knowledge share and proud Iam benefitting.
I have query w.r.t mysql and php installation.
1.When I was installing php-mysql rpm I was thrown dependency error and when I was trying to install using options"--aid and--force" also didnot solve installation.What is the solution?
2.what is the daemon to be started after installing the above ?
thanks in advance,
=======================================================
Hari.
"FORTUNE FAVOURS THE PREPARED MIND"-THANKU ALL ONCE AGAIN.
=======================================================
redhat-install-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
Send Redhat-install-list mailing list submissions to
redhat-install-list at redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
redhat-install-list-request at redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
redhat-install-list-owner at redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Redhat-install-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Fedora Core 2 (Danesh Daroui)
2. Re: x over ppp (Rick Stevens)
3. Re: Fedora Core 2 (Rick Stevens)
4. Re: Fedora Core 2 (Manuel Arostegui Ramirez)
5. FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time (jeffrey_n_Dyke at Keane.com)
6. Re: Fedora Core 2 (Danesh Daroui)
7. Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time (Rick Stevens)
8. Re: Fedora Core 2 (Rick Stevens)
9. Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time
(jeffrey_n_Dyke at Keane.com)
10. Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time (Rick Stevens)
11. Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time (Rick Stevens)
12. Oracle 9i under RedHat Linux 9 kernel 2.4.20-6 (Guillermo Silva)
13. Re: Oracle 9i under RedHat Linux 9 kernel 2.4.20-6 (Rick Stevens)
14. Newbie question about rmps (Manoel Fraga de Assis Jr)
15. Re: Newbie question about rmps (invincible invincible invincible)
16. Re: Newbie question about rmps (Rick Stevens)
17. Re: x over ppp (tyche)
18. Re: Newbie question about rmps (Manoel Fraga de Assis Jr)
19. Re: x over ppp (Rick Stevens)
20. Re: Newbie question about rmps (Rick Stevens)
21. Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time
(jeffrey_n_Dyke at Keane.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:43:46 +0200
From: "Danesh Daroui"
Subject: Fedora Core 2
To:
Message-ID: <000a01c45941$42d220b0$285671d5 at ciyasoftlap>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
Hi all,
I have a 900 Mhz Pentium III almost old PC and I want to install Fedora Core 2 on it, but I don't know should I download x86 64-bit version of Fedora Core 2 or i386 32-bit ? Also, I don't know either what is defference between RPMS and usual versions of Fedore Core 2. Can you please help me ?
Regards,
Danesh Daroui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /archives/redhat-install-list/attachments/20040623/7d6bb66c/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:42:25 -0700
From: Rick Stevens
Subject: Re: x over ppp
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID: <40D9B2F1.9080103 at vitalstream.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:31:50PM -0400, tyche wrote:
>
>>is there someway to pipe an X server out over a ppp connection to a windows
>>user with out getting into an expensive suite of software on teh windows end?
>
>
> Yes , there is,
> Install cygwin on your Windows system - it includes a free X-windows
> servers so that you can run X-windows on your Win box.
> Then you can tunnel the X-windows connection via IP thru your ppp
> connection.
>
> Your connection needs to be faster than dial up, or it will be painful
> to use.
>
> Cygwin is from "Cygnus" who is now owned by RedHat and the download
> should be freely available on their website somewhere.
>
>
> To learn how to do remote "X" connections check www.tldp.org, and look
> at the "HOW-TO" docs list. There is one which deals specifically
> on how to do that. Searching the list for "remote" should find it.
You can also use VNC via an SSH tunnel over a PPP connection (don't
forget to us the compression option on SSH).
By the way, double check the "X server" bit. The X server is the
machine with the keyboard, mouse and graphic screen. The X client is
the remote program that needs the X server to display its output. It
seems backwards at first, but that's the way it is.
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:48:41 -0700
From: Rick Stevens
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID: <40D9B469.90603 at vitalstream.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a 900 Mhz Pentium III almost old PC and I want to install Fedora
> Core 2 on it, but I don't know should I download x86 64-bit version of
> Fedora Core 2 or i386 32-bit ?
A Pentium III is a 32-bit processor, so you MUST use the 32-bit version
of Fedora Core 2 (or as we call it, "FC2").
> Also, I don't know either what is
> defference between RPMS and usual versions of Fedore Core 2. Can you
> please help me ?
An RPM is a specific package of programs to do some specific thing on
the system. For example, the "bind" RPM contains everything you need to
set up a DNS server or client.
If you want to install FC2, you should download the 32-bit ".iso" images
and burn them to a CD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- Do you know where _your_ towel is? -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Manuel Arostegui Ramirez
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID: <20040623165846.14476.qmail at web52401.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
--- Danesh Daroui escribió: >
Hi all,
>
> I have a 900 Mhz Pentium III almost old PC and I
> want to install Fedora Core 2 on it, but I don't
> know should I download x86 64-bit version of Fedora
> Core 2 or i386 32-bit ? Also, I don't know either
> what is defference between RPMS and usual versions
> of Fedore Core 2. Can you please help me ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Danesh Daroui
386 32-bit
Cheers
=====
--
Manuel Aróstegui Linux user 200896
http://manuel.todo-linux.com
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡100 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:19:16 -0400
From: jeffrey_n_Dyke at Keane.com
Subject: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi. This is not exactly a FC question/problem, but i'm getting nothing
from the ssh mailing lists or comp.security.ssh.
i have an issue where ssh logins are taking over 10 seconds. Assuming
this is the DNS error seen here->http://www.openssh.com/faq.html#3.3.
I tried to add both UseDNS no and AddressFamily inet. Both gave me errors
stating they were invalid options -->
/etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 33: Bad configuration option: UseDNS
/etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 35: Bad configuration option: AddressFamily
I'm running OpenSSH_3.6.1p2. on FC1, the following rpms are on my system
[root at jerry etc] rpm -qa | grep -i ssh
openssh-3.6.1p2-19
openssh-server-3.6.1p2-19
openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-19
openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-19
openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-19
The same slowness occurs when i the internal IP of 192.168.0.4. in
lieu of domain name.
any help is appreciated
Thanks
jeff
my /etc/ssh/sshd_config file that errors out as above.
# $OpenBSD: sshd_config,v 1.59 2002/09/25 11:17:16 markus Exp $
# This is the sshd server system-wide configuration file. See
# sshd_config(5) for more information.
# This sshd was compiled with PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
# The strategy used for options in the default sshd_config shipped
with
# OpenSSH is to specify options with their default value where
# possible, but leave them commented. Uncommented options change a
# default value.
#Port 22
#Protocol 2,1
#ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
#ListenAddress ::
# HostKey for protocol version 1
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
# HostKeys for protocol version 2
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
# Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
#KeyRegenerationInterval 3600
#ServerKeyBits 768
UseDNS no
AddressFamily inet
# Logging
#obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging
#SyslogFacility AUTH
SyslogFacility AUTHPRIV
#LogLevel INFO
# Authentication:
#LoginGraceTime 120
#PermitRootLogin yes
#StrictModes yes
#RSAAuthentication yes
#PubkeyAuthentication yes
#AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys
# rhosts authentication should not be used
#RhostsAuthentication no
# Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files
#IgnoreRhosts yes
# For this to work you will also need host keys in
/etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts
#RhostsRSAAuthentication no
# similar for protocol version 2
#HostbasedAuthentication no
# Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for
# RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication
#IgnoreUserKnownHosts no
# To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here!
#PasswordAuthentication yes
#PermitEmptyPasswords no
# Change to no to disable s/key passwords
#ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes
# Kerberos options
#KerberosAuthentication no
#KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes
#KerberosTicketCleanup yes
#AFSTokenPassing no
# Kerberos TGT Passing only works with the AFS kaserver
#KerberosTgtPassing no
# Set this to 'yes' to enable PAM keyboard-interactive authentication
# Warning: enabling this may bypass the setting of
'PasswordAuthentication'
#PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt no
#X11Forwarding no
X11Forwarding yes
#X11DisplayOffset 10
#X11UseLocalhost yes
#PrintMotd yes
#PrintLastLog yes
#KeepAlive yes
#UseLogin no
#UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
#PermitUserEnvironment no
#Compression yes
#MaxStartups 10
# no default banner path
#Banner /some/path
#VerifyReverseMapping no
# override default of no subsystems
Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:20:41 +0200
From: "Danesh Daroui"
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
To: "Getting started with Red Hat Linux"
Message-ID: <001201c45946$68c10700$285671d5 at ciyasoftlap>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Finally you mean that a RPMS version of Fedora core 2 is complete and
installable like usula vesion or it is ONLY packages and not the basic Linux
?
Regards,
Danesh Daroui
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Stevens"
To: "Getting started with Red Hat Linux"
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
> Danesh Daroui wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a 900 Mhz Pentium III almost old PC and I want to install Fedora
> > Core 2 on it, but I don't know should I download x86 64-bit version of
> > Fedora Core 2 or i386 32-bit ?
>
> A Pentium III is a 32-bit processor, so you MUST use the 32-bit version
> of Fedora Core 2 (or as we call it, "FC2").
>
> > Also, I don't know either what is
> > defference between RPMS and usual versions of Fedore Core 2. Can you
> > please help me ?
>
> An RPM is a specific package of programs to do some specific thing on
> the system. For example, the "bind" RPM contains everything you need to
> set up a DNS server or client.
>
> If you want to install FC2, you should download the 32-bit ".iso" images
> and burn them to a CD.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
> - VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
> - -
> - Do you know where _your_ towel is? -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> Redhat-install-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to:
> redhat-install-list-request at redhat.com
> Subject: unsubscribe
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:26:52 -0700
From: Rick Stevens
Subject: Re: FC1 and SSH - logins taking a long time
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID: <40D9BD5C.3060404 at vitalstream.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
jeffrey_n_Dyke at Keane.com wrote:
> Hi. This is not exactly a FC question/problem, but i'm getting nothing
> from the ssh mailing lists or comp.security.ssh.
>
> i have an issue where ssh logins are taking over 10 seconds. Assuming
> this is the DNS error seen here->http://www.openssh.com/faq.html#3.3.
> I tried to add both UseDNS no and AddressFamily inet. Both gave me errors
> stating they were invalid options -->
>
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 33: Bad configuration option: UseDNS
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config: line 35: Bad configuration option: AddressFamily
>
> I'm running OpenSSH_3.6.1p2. on FC1, the following rpms are on my system
>
> [root at jerry etc] rpm -qa | grep -i ssh
> openssh-3.6.1p2-19
> openssh-server-3.6.1p2-19
> openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-19
> openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-19
> openssh-clients-3.6.1p2-19
>
>
> The same slowness occurs when i the internal IP of 192.168.0.4. in
> lieu of domain name.
>
> any help is appreciated
The configuration below is pretty standard. My guess is that you really
do have a DNS issue. The most likely problem is that reverse DNS is not
working (that's IP-to-hostname rather than normal DNS which is
hostname-to-IP). You could verify this by getting on the SSN target
machine (192.168.0.4) and running:
tcpdump port 53
and watching the output to see if the DNS stuff is being resolved right
or timing out when you try to ssh to that machine.
Since you're on a non-routable IP address (192.168/16), a reverse DNS
lookup will most likely fail unless you either run an internal DNS
server on your local LAN with a full reverse DNS database or you add the
appropriate entries to the SSH target's /etc/hosts file.
> my /etc/ssh/sshd_config file that errors out as above.
> # $OpenBSD: sshd_config,v 1.59 2002/09/25 11:17:16 markus Exp $
>
> # This is the sshd server system-wide configuration file. See
> # sshd_config(5) for more information.
>
> # This sshd was compiled with PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
>
> # The strategy used for options in the default sshd_config shipped
> with
> # OpenSSH is to specify options with their default value where
> # possible, but leave them commented. Uncommented options change a
> # default value.
>
> #Port 22
> #Protocol 2,1
> #ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
> #ListenAddress ::
>
> # HostKey for protocol version 1
> #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
> # HostKeys for protocol version 2
> #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key
> #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
>
> # Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
> #KeyRegenerationInterval 3600
> #ServerKeyBits 768
> UseDNS no
> AddressFamily inet
> # Logging
> #obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging
> #SyslogFacility AUTH
> SyslogFacility AUTHPRIV
> #LogLevel INFO
> # Authentication:
> #LoginGraceTime 120
> #PermitRootLogin yes
> #StrictModes yes
>
> #RSAAuthentication yes
> #PubkeyAuthentication yes
> #AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys
>
> # rhosts authentication should not be used
> #RhostsAuthentication no
> # Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files
> #IgnoreRhosts yes
> # For this to work you will also need host keys in
> /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts
> #RhostsRSAAuthentication no
> # similar for protocol version 2
> #HostbasedAuthentication no
> # Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for
> # RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication
> #IgnoreUserKnownHosts no
>
> # To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here!
> #PasswordAuthentication yes
> #PermitEmptyPasswords no
>
> # Change to no to disable s/key passwords
> #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes
>
> # Kerberos options
> #KerberosAuthentication no
> #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes
> #KerberosTicketCleanup yes
>
> #AFSTokenPassing no
>
> # Kerberos TGT Passing only works with the AFS kaserver
> #KerberosTgtPassing no
>
> # Set this to 'yes' to enable PAM keyboard-interactive authentication
> # Warning: enabling this may bypass the setting of
> 'PasswordAuthentication'
> #PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt no
>
> #X11Forwarding no
> X11Forwarding yes
> #X11DisplayOffset 10
> #X11UseLocalhost yes
> #PrintMotd yes
> #PrintLastLog yes
> #KeepAlive yes
> #UseLogin no
> #UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
> #PermitUserEnvironment no
> #Compression yes
>
> #MaxStartups 10
> # no default banner path
> #Banner /some/path
> #VerifyReverseMapping no
>
> # override default of no subsystems
> Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server
As I said, that's pretty standard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:34:40 -0700
From: Rick Stevens
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Message-ID: <40D9BF30.1050704 at vitalstream.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Finally you mean that a RPMS version of Fedora core 2 is complete and
> installable like usula vesion or it is ONLY packages and not the basic Linux
> ?
A collection of ALL of the RPMs is complete, but it's not an installable
image. In other words, yes, you can _upgrade_ an _existing_ Linux
system to FC2 using a bunch of RPMs, but it's incredibly tedious and
prone to errors.
The ".iso" files are exact images of the installation CDs that would be
available if FC2 were to be sold in a boxed set. You download the .iso
files and burn them to CDs using a program such as "Roxio" under Windows
(using the "use file as CD image" option) or "cdrecord" under Linux.
This creates bootable CDs, so you can put the first CD in the CD-ROM
drive, reboot your machine and immediately enter the install process.
For some details on how to do this operation, see:
http://www.rhil.net/docs/faq.html
By the way, Danesh, we prefer bottom-posting here (put your comments
AFTER what you're commenting on). It helps with the flow of the
message.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Stevens"
> To: "Getting started with Red Hat Linux"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 6:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2
>
>
>
>>Danesh Daroui wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I have a 900 Mhz Pentium III almost old PC and I want to install Fedora
>>>Core 2 on it, but I don't know should I download x86 64-bit version of
>>>Fedora Core 2 or i386 32-bit ?
>>
>>A Pentium III is a 32-bit processor, so you MUST use the 32-bit version
>>of Fedora Core 2 (or as we call it, "FC2").
>>
>>
>>> Also, I don't know either what is
=== message truncated ===
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/redhat-install-list/attachments/20040624/72b1a6ce/attachment.htm>
More information about the Redhat-install-list
mailing list