install grub on LVM

Tue Sep 18 23:32:41 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 15:15 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:23 -0500, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:10:37PM -0500, Fred Grant wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:02 -0500, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:39:20AM -0500, Fred Grant wrote:
> > > > > I want to install grub on hd1 boot partition which is LVM.
> > > OK it's not LVM, it's ext3.  I must have been looking at swap.
> > > > 
> > > > hd1?  Do you mean hda?  Or hda1?
> > > > hda1
> > > > I didn't think you could boot LVM partitions.  Let's be clear on this.
> > > > An LVM partition is somewhat like an extended partition in that it
> > > > does not contain any kind of filesystem.  It does, however, contain
> > > > one or more logical volumes each of which which may contain a
> > > > filesystem.
> > > > 
> > > > Customarily, there is (at least) one plain linux partition with an
> > > > ext[23] filesystem on it, which is designated as the /boot partition.
> > > > You will likely have another partition, type LVM, which contains one
> > > > or more logical volumes containing filesystems for /, /home, etc.
> > > > Still, you would normally install grub on the MBR of that disk, e.g.,
> > > > for /dev/hda
> > > > 
> > > >   grub-install /dev/hda
> > > I did this and result is indicated below.
> > 
> > While booted to FC5?  If so, show us the grub.conf for that system.
> > 
> > > > Care to share a bit more information about your desired setup?
> > > ------------
> > > fdisk:
> > > Disk /dev/hda: 30.7 GB, 30750031872 bytes
> > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3738 cylinders
> > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > 
> > >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> > > /dev/hda1   *           1          13      104391   83  Linux
> > > /dev/hda2              14        3738    29921062+  8e  Linux LVM
> > > 
> > > Disk /dev/hdb: 61.4 GB, 61492838400 bytes
> > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7476 cylinders
> > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > 
> > >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> > > /dev/hdb1   *           1        7288    58540828+  83  Linux
> > > /dev/hdb2            7289        7476     1510110    5  Extended
> > > /dev/hdb5            7289        7476     1510078+  82  Linux swap /
> > > Solaris
> > > 
> > > Disk /dev/dm-0: 29.5 GB, 29527900160 bytes
> > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3589 cylinders
> > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > 
> > > Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table
> > > 
> > > Disk /dev/dm-1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
> > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
> > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > > 
> > > Disk /dev/dm-1 doesn't contain a valid partition table
> > 
> > The above two errors can be ignored.
> > 
> > > -------------------
> > > Per the above, I have F5 installed on hda and Ubuntu live cd on hdb.  In
> > > BIOS I select "boot from HDD1" and boot fails.  If I select "boot from
> > > HDD2", boot succeeds.  Is it possible that BIOS considers hda to be
> > > HDD2?
> > 
> > Could be.  The BIOS will tell you.
> > 
> > > Can it be toggled?
> > 
> > In most recent machines, yes.  Look in the BIOS under something like
> > Boot Order or drive swapping.  Rick has a lot more experience with
> > that and can probably tell you exactly.
> 
> Hoo boy!  It depends on the BIOS.  First, keep in mind that grub doesn't
> know about hda, hdb, etc. as those are what the Linux kernel calls them.
> In fact, there is no "hd" stuff in the F7 and later kernels.  All hard
> drives are treated as SCSI drives and are given the names "sda", "sdb",
> etc. regardless of their interface type (for example, ATA is really just
> SCSI over IDE cables).
> 
> Now this depends on the specific BIOS involved, but the vast majority
> give the first bootable hard drive the low-level identifier of 0x80, the
> second drive 0x81 and so on (this traces back to the old BDOS "int15"
> calls to the BIOS) and THOSE are what grub relies on (in fact, the old
> LILO boot loader used the "0x80"-type nomenclature).  While they're
> called "hd(drive,partition)" in grub's config file, that's just to
> differentiate hard drives from floppy drives.  You can think of grub's
> "hd(0,..." as meaning "BDOS device 0x80", and "fd(0,..." means "BDOS
> device 0x00".
> 
> So by changing the boot order in your BIOS, you've forced it to assign
> your SECOND drive the 0x80 identifier and the FIRST drive the 0x81
> identifier.  Since Linux inherits the primary drive from the boot loader
> (and BIOS), it will think your SECOND drive is hda (or sda), and the
> FIRST drive as hdb (or sdb).
I don't think I can change it in BIOS but grub may pick it up
"backwards".
I'll check those settings in BIOS.
> 
> I'm guessing that's probably more than you want to know, but there it
> is.  ;-)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer             rstevens at internap.com -
> - CDN Systems, Internap, Inc.                http://www.internap.com -
> -                                                                    -
> -               The Theory of Rapitivity: E=MC Hammer                -
> -                                  -- Glenn Marcus (via TopFive.com) -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> Redhat-install-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to:
> redhat-install-list-request at redhat.com
> Subject: unsubscribe
>