Anyone Get Syslog-NG Compiled on Red Hat 9?

Rhugga redhat-list at sandiego420.com
Fri Aug 27 16:12:22 UTC 2004


Michael Schwendt wrote:

>On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:06:27 -0500, Rhugga wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I am trying to get syslog-ng 1.6.5 compiled on a RH 9 system. I compiled 
>>libol into /usr/local/libol-0.3.14.
>>
>>I tried the following configuration options when trying to build sysllg-ng:
>>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/syslog-ng-1.6.5 
>>--with-libol=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14/lib 
>>--with-libnet=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14/bin/
>>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/syslog-ng-1.6.5 
>>--with-libol=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14/lib 
>>--with-libnet=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14
>>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/syslog-ng-1.6.5 
>>--with-libol=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14/lib 
>>--with-libnet=/usr/local/libol-0.3.14/bin/libol-config
>>
>>Each time is complains that it cannot find libol-config:
>>
>><snip>
>>checking for strptime... yes
>>checking for TCP wrapper library... -lwrap
>>checking whether to enable Sun STREAMS support... no
>>checking whether to enable Sun door support... no
>>checking whether to enable TCP wrapper support... no
>>checking whether to enable spoof_source support... no
>>checking libol version >= 0.3.14... configure: error: libol-config not 
>>found in the specified location
>>
>>Here is libol-config:
>>syslog:~/syslog-ng-1.6.5 #ls -la /usr/local/libol-0.3.14/bin/
>>total 36
>>drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Aug 27 07:22 .
>>drwxr-xr-x    5 root     root         4096 Aug 27 07:22 ..
>>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         1288 Aug 27 07:22 libol-config
>>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root        24264 Aug 27 07:22 make_class
>>
>>It finds the libol library correctly, otherwise it dies before it 
>>reaches this error. It just doesn't properly detect libol-config.
>>
>>Anyone have any ideas?
>>    
>>
>
>Examine the configure script or configure.{in,ac} on where it searches
>for libol-config. It's likely that it expects the tool to be in
>standard search PATH. E.g. try moving it into /usr/local/bin
>
>
>  
>
Yea, that was my next course of action but having the configure 
parameter to specify the location of the library and then not have it 
work properly throws up a red flag as to the stability of the product. I 
plan to use this under a very heavy enterprise load and if something 
simple as the confgiuration management is broken, it make one wonder 
what else is. I have yet to receive any form or response from  Bala Bit, 
however, I do see where you can __purchase__ support.  Yea, where can I 
send my check.

Thanks though,
rhugga





More information about the redhat-list mailing list