OT (maybe) DNS delagation on RH9
dbrett
dbrett at tcn.net
Fri Jun 4 19:42:22 UTC 2004
Hi Ed
I agree I would do it the way suggested. this zone file was created by
bind. It is a slave zone I grabed to show everybody.
david
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:50:17PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > What I see is an A record for "NS", which would translate to
> > "NS.company.com".
> >
> > You need an A record for "ns.corp", which would then translate to
> > "ns.corp.company.com".
>
> It's there. See the $ORIGIN line - that says he's got a record for
> ns.corp.company.com.
>
> Personally, I would expand that ns.corp name to ns.corp.company.com.
> (with the trailing dot).
>
> > > > > corp NS ns.corp
> > > > > $ORIGIN corp.company.com.
> > > > > NS A 192.168.1.100
> > > > >
> > > > > david
> > > >
> > > > I don't see an A record for "ns.corp" with an IP address.
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, RHCE
> Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
> Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list