More help needed please

[Jason Staudenmayer]

Why isn't there any traffic on eth1? No you don't need a route for the NIC
installed in the system.
Remove that bad route and post your firewall settings.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jim.marnell at cca-int.com [mailto:jim.marnell at cca-int.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:18 PM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: More help needed please
> 
> 
> Thanks to all responders. Both nics are set to come up at boot time. 
> Here's more info...
> [root at redfish root]# netstat -nr
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS 
> Window  irtt 
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0         204.62.134.209  255.255.255.255 UGH       0 0 
>          0 
> eth0
> 10.10.30.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0 
>          0 
> eth1
> 204.62.134.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0 
>          0 
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U         0 0 
>          0 
> lo
> 0.0.0.0         204.62.134.248  0.0.0.0         UG        0 0 
>          0 
> eth0
> [root at redfish root]# ifconfig eth0
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:10:5A:11:83:C0 
>           inet addr:204.62.134.209  Bcast:204.62.134.255 
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:5899 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:824 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
>           RX bytes:590413 (576.5 Kb)  TX bytes:94622 (92.4 Kb)
>           Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe400 
> 
> [root at redfish root]# ifconfig eth1
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:04:75:81:5A:01 
>           inet addr:10.10.30.248  Bcast:10.10.30.255  
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2880 (2.8 Kb)
>           Interrupt:5 Base address:0xe800 
> 
> [root at redfish root]# 
> That first routing entry should not be there and may be a bug. In an 
> attempt to solve this problem I added a route on the eth1 
> interface via 
> system settings/network. It didn't help so I removed it but 
> it remains in 
> my routing table.
> My real default route is the last entry.
> Do I need any routing in place for one nic to talk to the other in rh 
> land?
> -Jim
> 
> 
> 
> Ed Wilts <ewilts at ewilts.org> 
> Sent by: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> 06/24/2004 02:57 PM
> Please respond to
> General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> 
> 
> To
> General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: More help needed please
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:37:39PM -0400, 
> jim.marnell at cca-int.com wrote:
> > Anyone else care to take a stab at why my rh 8 box with 2 
> nics cannot 
> talk 
> > to each other. I'll try anything.
> > eth0 can ping itself
> > eth1 can ping itself
> > eth0 can ping eth1
> > eth1 CANNOT ping eth0
> > 
> > ip_forward has been set to 1
> 
> Do you have routes to get from where you are to where you want to go? 
> 
> # netstat -rn
> 
> -- 
> Ed Wilts, RHCE
> Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
> Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>