[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Secondary Mail Server



On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:52:00AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 03:22 3/16/2004, you wrote:
> >second thing your dns and sendmail both are on same machine this might 
> >cause problem as your dns have to be on separate machine.
> 
> False.
> 
> There is nothing that requires sendmail and BIND to run on separate 
> machines, and in light-traffic situations there is no real benefit either.

For high load activity, it's very advantageous to actually have bind
running on a sendmail server.  sendmail does a *LOT* of dns activity.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts ewilts org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]