Mount question

[Ed Wilts]

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 05:55:33PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Robert C Paulsen Jr wrote:
> 
> >Ext2 is a reasonable
> >choice:
> >
> >mkfs.ext2 /dev/hdb9
> >
>    This raises a question now: why (still) ext2 and not ext3?

Because he is running RHL 7.0.  I'm not sure that ext3 was present back
then.  7.0 was kind of a weird release with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels and
the user got to chose.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program