Kernel 2.6 and Kernel 2.4

Otto Haliburton ottohaliburton at comcast.net
Sat Sep 4 02:59:02 UTC 2004



> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Otto Haliburton
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 9:49 PM
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: RE: Kernel 2.6 and Kernel 2.4
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> > bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steve Phillips
> > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 9:16 PM
> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> > Subject: RE: Kernel 2.6 and Kernel 2.4
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> >
> > > Somehow I think that you have missed the object of the fedora project.
> > > Maybe I will get in trouble with the list, but IMHO you should not be
> > > thinking of fc2 as a production product period, kernel or anything
> else.
> > I
> > > might be wrong but that's my opinion.
> >
> > Without your reasoning then it is simply that - an Opinion.
> >
> > If you dont want to be flamed for saying stupid things then it would be
> > prudent to back up your opinion with some reasoning.
> >
> > In some situations FC2 is quite fine as a production OS, it is after all
> a
> > "Stable" release instead of a development one.
> >
> > Obviously the rules with any "newer" OS apply, but past that I cant
> really
> > see the reasoning behind your statement.
> >
> > unless your entire purpose was to spread FUD.
> >
> > --
> > Steve.
> You can obviously do what you would like but again I suggest you research
> the purpose of the fedora project and it is based on that purpose that I
> made the statement.  The purpose of the project is develop OSF and at
> times
> many things maybe broken and at different levels of development.  While
> they
> are adequately tested, they still may have major problems and it is also
> stated by the way that you should be cautious about using the products in
> a
> production environment.  Before you go calling someone stupid you need to
> read (there is nothing like getting the facts).  I was cautioning this guy
> about using this product in a production environment because he doesn't
> have
> support other than this forum.  So as I said people who don't understand
> what the fedora project is about should be leary of using any of the
> products in a production environment stupid.
> 
> 
you didn't call me stupid and my calling you stupid is across the line, I
apologize, but hopefully you are able to caution people about using these
products in a production environment is at their own risk.






More information about the redhat-list mailing list