GLIBC-2.3.4 on FC2? **RESOLVED**

Harding, Devon dharding at southernwine.com
Tue Mar 22 20:07:51 UTC 2005


The issue I was having was actually with zlib.  When I ran up2date or
any rpm, I would get: 

- up2date
   Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 12, in ?
      import rpm
   ImportError: /usr/lib/libz.so.1: symbol __fprintf_chk, version
    GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

I followed the instructions here and solved the problem:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-February/msg01538.html 

-Devon

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:29 PM
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: GLIBC-2.3.4 on FC2?

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:30 -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:58:34AM -0500, Harding, Devon wrote:
> > I'm trying to install a few rpms that require glibc-2.3.4.  The
latest
> > update on FC2 is 2.3.3.  Can you use the updates for FC3
> > (glibc-2.3.4-2.fc3.i386.rpm) on FC2 or would I have to upgrade my RH
> > version?
> 
> NEVER install a glibc on any platform for which it was not intended.  
> The normal approach to installing packages that require a newer
platform
> is to take the source rpm and rebuild it.  Most of the time (if the
> differences aren't too great), this will give you a good installable
> package.

Also make sure you install the package for the right architecture and
not
just grab the i386 one when you most likely want the i686 glibc instead.

-- 
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux 2.6.11-1.3_FC3
loadavg: 0.11 0.27 0.62

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




More information about the redhat-list mailing list