Linux vs Microsoft -postgres

[Darryl W. DeLao Jr.]

Good stuff, thanks for the help...

Darryl


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:17:00 +0800, robert hunter <rhunter at iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Having administered Unix, Linux and Microsoft servers and networks I
> have come to the following conclusions:-
> 
> 1. Any Microsoft network that is not protected by a Linux or Pix
> firewall is a waste of time.
> 
> 2. Microsoft servers are slower and less reliable that *nix units.
> 
> 3. Microsoft are incapable of producing a secure firewall eg. Proxy
> Server!
> 
> 4. Any advantage that Microsoft servers had in terms of acl's have now
> dissapeared with the advent of SELinux.
> 
> 5. The only decent Microsoft server is their exchange server, which is
> rather nice.
> 
> 6. Microsoft, with it's less than ethical business plan, is a threat to
> Governments, business, and ordinary users world-wide.
> 
> 7. Who, in their right mind, would run a server that runs it's GUI in
> kernel space, rather than user space? And furthermore, you can't disable
> it.
> 
> 8. Why not grow a backbone, and some ethics, and use open source
> software that is ethical, efficient, profitable and promotes innovation?
> 
> 9. Open source software, such as Linux reduces barriers to entry of new
> companies.
> 
> 10. Most MCSE's I have known, except those who have cross-certified in
> Unix, CISCO, Linux, are generally idiots. They haven't got a clue about
> how to run a network properly and securely. And they have virtually no
> trouble-shooting skills.
> 
> Bob Hunter.
> 
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>