[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Hanging process cannot be killed except from "kill -9"



What about sending the hung process a different signal, 
like SIGHUP or SIGTERM  to get it to clean up properly...?

I cant answer your first question, since you would have
to specify _WHAT_PROCESS_ is hanging.

For your second question, Yes there is a work around;  Don't
write code that hangs.. ;)

-G


Regards,

Gavin McDonald
========================
EVI Logistic Enterprises
email: me gavitron com
phone: (604) 313-3845



> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces redhat com [mailto:redhat-list-
> bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Radtanapan Janjanejob
> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:06 PM
> To: redhat-list redhat com
> Subject: Hanging process cannot be killed except from "kill -9"
> 
> I understand that this issue used to be posted in many web site. However,
> most of users delighted with "kill -9" command even though the resource
> cannot be returned clearly. I would very much appreciated if anyone can
> give me an advice for the following questions:
> 
> - Is it the known issue of the Red Hat?
> - Is there any workaround/solution which is better than "kill -9" e.g.
> coding style or how to tune machine?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]