slocate doesn't
Michael Johnson
mjohnson at coderyte.com
Sat Apr 15 16:02:26 UTC 2006
On Apr 15, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Even on production servers you don't want to have it running. We
> seldom
> touch those anyway once in production.
Just curious as to why. I'm a diversity sort of guy. I don't like
the single point of failure idea of all the servers being exactly the
same brand, disk topology, processor, and OS. Some things you can't
get around, but for the most part keeping diversity helps when
something goes seriously wrong.
With that in mind, when I'm looking for my httpd.conf file, it might
be in /etc/httpd/ or /etc/httpd/conf/ or even in /usr/local/etc/
httpd/ among others. I know the file I'm looking for, but on
different systems it can be in slightly different locations. For
this purpose, I like to have slocate running. It's not that much of
a drain on the system at all.
-Michael
PS This isn't intended as a flame at all. I'm honestly curious. I
enjoy understanding the other side of any argument as it can help to
strengthen or convert. =-)
--
----------------------------------------------------------
| Michael Johnson | Sr. Systems Engineer |
| mjohnson at coderyte.com | CodeRyte |
| +1-301-951-5315 | http://www.coderyte.com/ |
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list