No more tasks for init ---- sleeping forever
Bhagyashri Bijwe
bhagyashri.bijwe at gmail.com
Wed Aug 9 08:27:59 UTC 2006
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I am using busybox-1.00-pre4 instead of busybox-1.00 because I
have product on gcc version 2.96 and busybox-1.00 required GLIBC_2.3.
I tried
> try to execute ash instead of init
>mv /sbin/init /sbin/init.old
> echo "#!/bin/sh
>while true; /bin/ash; done" > /sbin/init
>chmod a+x /sbin/init
But,It gives
Going to execute /sbin/init
sh:
It gives blinking cursor.It does nothing afterwards.
Does it mean I have to execute init? I tried to type something, it
does nothing unlike normal shell.
Plz help me.
On 8/9/06, Roberto A. Foglietta <roberto.foglietta at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bhagyashri Bijwe wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I made distribution for Soekris4521 using linux2.2.16,
> > UClibc0.9.19 and busybox-1.00-pre4.
>
> Why you use busybox-1.00-pre4?
>
> The "pre4" means it is not stable but the 4th try to deliver
> busybox-1.00. I suggest to use busybox-1.00
>
> try to execute ash instead of init
>
> mv /sbin/init /sbin/init.old
> echo "#!/bin/sh
> while true; /bin/ash; done" > /sbin/init
> chmod a+x /sbin/init
>
> or try this
>
> > etc/init.d/rcS is
> >
> > mount -t proc none /proc
> while true; /bin/ash; done
>
> an try to execute init by hand
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Roberto A. Foglietta
> http://roberto.foglietta.name
> http://linux.genova.it
>
--
***********************************************
Ms Bhagyashri Bijwe
Project Eng.
Networking and Internet Software Group,
Centre for Research and Development,
Pune,India
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list