Leap Second Kernel Panic??

[Michael D. Berger]

Both boxes rebooted (cold) with no problem and are
up and running.
Mike.

--
Michael D. Berger
m.d.berger at ieee.org 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com 
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:59 AM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: Leap Second Kernel Panic??
> 
> 
> My bad, sorry.  Did it reboot OK?  Is the message gone?
> 
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
> 
> >Version on what?  Note below:
> >  
> >
> >>>  Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4(Nahant)
> >>>  Kernel 2.6.9-5.EL on an i686
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >Mike.
> >--
> >Michael D. Berger
> >m.d.berger at ieee.org 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com 
> >>[mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi
> >>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:21 AM
> >>To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> >>Subject: Re: Leap Second Kernel Panic??
> >>
> >>
> >>It would help to provide the version you are running.  All 27 of my 
> >>servers running AS 3 are just fine.
> >>
> >>Michael D. Berger wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>I have two linux boxes that run all the time.  I was away for
> >>>a few days over New Year, and came home to find both boxes
> >>>locked up with this on the screens, with the only differences
> >>>shown by yy and xxxxxxxx:
> >>>
> >>>  Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4(Nahant)
> >>>  Kernel 2.6.9-5.EL on an i686
> >>>
> >>>  mbrcyy login: Clock: inserting leap second: 23:59:60 UTC
> >>>  Kernel panic - not syncing: net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c:211:
> >>>  spin_lock(net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:xxxxxxxx) already locked by
> >>>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c/1790
> >>>
> >>>  yy = 32, xxxxxxxx = f5fee080
> >>>  yy = 20, xxxxxxxx = c276aa40
> >>>
> >>>I add that both boxes are running:
> >>>  ntpd (but only one talks to the outside world)
> >>>  net_queue_d, a new and rather complex libipq daemon I am 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>developing
> >>    
> >>
> >>>I of course suspect my libipq daemon, but the apparent relation
> >>>to the leap second is peculiar.
> >>>
> >>>Assistance would be much appreciated.  If additional 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>information would
> >>    
> >>
> >>>help, please tell me what it is.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Mike.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Michael D. Berger
> >>>m.d.berger at ieee.org 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>-- 
> >>veritatis simplex oratio est
> >>		- Seneca
> >>
> >>Andrew Bacchi
> >>Staff Systems Programmer
> >>Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> >>phone: 518 276-6415  fax: 518 276-2809
> >>
> >>http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
> >>
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>redhat-list mailing list
> >>unsubscribe 
> mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> veritatis simplex oratio est
> 		- Seneca
> 
> Andrew Bacchi
> Staff Systems Programmer
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> phone: 518 276-6415  fax: 518 276-2809
> 
> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>