SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER

[Lord of Gore]

Res wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Lord of Gore wrote:
>
>>
>>>>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17207
>>>>> ...
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yes , so???? I write that sendmail has more security problems that
>>> postfix, not sendmail has currently unfixed security holes :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> js.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I don't know why you argue so much when qmail was, is and will remain 
>> the most secure of them all  >:)
>
> hard not to be secure when it does nothing by default :)
>
> and in fact if used in virtual domains, without patches written by 
> other people qmail is far more of a security problem and with lots of 
> backchatter
>
>
Good one. I suppose you use sendmail or postfix version 2.0.0 without 
any patches and upgrades, just for the fun of it. lol